Next News Network

In a shocking twist of irony, Bud Light’s latest move to court the LGBTQ+ community backfired, resulting in a colossal PR disaster and severe sales slump.

In a shocking twist of irony, Bud Light’s latest move to court the LGBTQ+ community backfired, resulting in a colossal PR disaster and severe sales slump.

Bud Light, America’s flagship beer, is feeling the heat from a PR nightmare after partnering with transgender influencer, Dylan Mulvaney. The move was intended to appeal to the LGBTQ+ demographic. However, it has instead resulted in alienation of many of its conservative customers, causing sales to plummet 26 percent.

In response to the brewing storm, the Human Rights Campaign, the country’s largest advocacy group for LGBTQ+ rights, took the unprecedented step of suspending Bud Light’s Corporate Equality Index (CEI) score. Prior to the suspension, Bud Light had enjoyed the maximum CEI score of 100. This rating has implications beyond just social inclusivity, as it also connects to a company’s financial health. For instance, 15 of the top 20 Fortune-ranked companies received perfect ratings from HRC last year. The suspension means that Bud Light can no longer carry the coveted ‘Best Places to Work’ distinction.

Senator Ted Cruz is piling on the pressure, calling for a federal investigation into whether Bud Light breached regulatory guidelines prohibiting marketing to those under the legal drinking age.

This marketing mishap has brought unexpected consequences. The company and CEO Michel Doukeris are now reportedly buying back unsold and expired cases of beer. A photo circulating on social media shows stacks of 24-can cases of Bud Light offering full rebates, essentially giving the beer away for free. Customers are speculating that things must not be going well if the company resorts to such tactics.

This unfortunate partnership has had severe implications on Bud Light’s sales. Retail data shows the brand’s sales have declined for the fifth straight week, down 23.6% compared to a year ago.

The company plans to revamp its branding, attempting to salvage its image by aligning Bud Light with the sponsorship of a veterans organization. However, the question remains whether this move will be enough to regain the trust and loyalty of the brand’s disgruntled customers.

In conclusion, Bud Light’s failed attempt at marketing inclusivity has served as a harsh reminder of the consequences of recklessness and insensitivity. The beer giant now wallows in the aftermath of a catastrophic misstep that has not only tarnished its image but also substantially dented its sales. It is doubtful whether any rebranding or sponsorship efforts can wash away the stain of such a major PR disaster. Indeed, for Bud Light, this may be a bitter lesson in humility and a dark spot in their corporate history, one that might continue to overshadow their future endeavors.

Let’s continue this conversation, in the comments below.