Next News Network

**Feinstein’s Faded Faculties Raise Concerns Over Democrats’ Pursuit for Power**

In a desperate grab for power, Democrats are pushing 89-year-old Senator Dianne Feinstein to continue her duties despite her severe health complications. With her return to the Senate after a 3-month hiatus, questions arise on whether Democrats truly care for their own or just want to wield control.

Feinstein, a California Senator, shocked the public as she reappeared in a wheelchair after a 3-month absence due to shingles. Her condition presents an alarming decline, including facial paralysis, memory loss, vision and balance impairments, and even swelling of the brain. Despite these hindrances, Democrats seem keen on keeping her in office.

As reported by The New York Times, Feinstein now relies heavily on a team of aides to perform her duties in the Senate. Staff members not only wheel her into the chamber, but also help her get settled in a chair, and guide her through the voting process. The situation reached a point where Feinstein appeared confused over Kamala Harris presiding over the Senate, reportedly asking, “What is she doing here?” This confusion stems from her struggle to grasp the basics of Senate functions, which further highlights the questionable motive behind the party’s decision to keep her functioning under these conditions.

It is quite evident that Feinstein’s cognitive decline presents a challenging situation, yet it appears the Democrats continue to push her forward. This raises deep concerns regarding the genuine welfare and intentions of the party in their pursuit for power. Are the Democrats truly concerned about their member, or are they just making use of her stature to strengthen their position?

**The Democrats’ Dilemma: Exploiting Feinstein for Control or Genuine Concern?**

Ignoring the glaring issues surrounding Feinstein’s capacity to serve, the Democrats must question their own motives in this relentless pursuit of power. Does their exploitation of Feinstein’s diminished faculties serve their ambitions, or reveal a darker side to their leadership?

Source