Next News Network

**Biden Administration Ridiculed for Banning Male and Female Terms**

The Biden administration faces criticism after the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reportedly banned the use of male and female terms. This new language policy is seen by conservatives as the latest move promoting “woke ideology” and regulating language, fueling their disapproval of the president.

The GAO, the government’s primary watchdog organization, recently issued a language style guide prohibiting the use of male and female terms and terms that lower anybody’s dignity. This information comes from an internal memo leaked in October that emphasizes the need for inclusive language to respect individual identities and preferences.

To create a more inclusive environment, the guide advises replacing words such as “man-made” with “artificial,” “synthetic,” or “manufactured” and substituting “manned” with “crewed” or “piloted.” Other forbidden terms include “manpower,” “unmanned,” and “policeman.” The memo also highlights that staff should distinguish between sex and gender and recognize that not everyone identifies within the binary.

In addition, the new policy bars the use of “dehumanizing” terms such as “alien,” “illegal alien,” “illegal immigrant,” and “illegals” when referring to individuals who are not US citizens. However, conservatives have slammed the GAO’s language policy, calling it a push to promote “woke ideology” within the Biden administration.

Critics argue that the president should focus on more pressing issues such as inflation, crime, and border control, rather than imposing a “woke ideology” on Americans. Republicans also express concerns that valuable government time and resources are wasted on language regulation instead of addressing real problems within the country.

In response, GAO officials stated that this language policy is under review, and changes may be considered in the future.

**Ultimately, it is clear that Americans must prioritize pressing issues instead of wasting valuable resources on regulating language.**

Source