Next News Network

**Tuesday’s Morning Joe Show’s attack on The Heritage Foundation illustrated the persistent divide between liberal and conservative thought as MSNBC continues to herald its liberal bias. By omitting key facts, Scarborough’s tirade against the think tank only serves as a damning reminder of the media’s relentless crusade against conservative ideals.**

In Tuesday’s Morning Joe segment, host Joe Scarborough criticized The Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, for advocating the defunding and restructuring of the FBI. However, Scarborough conveniently omitted that Roberts’ comments stemmed from a legitimate concern: the weaponization of the federal government against conservatives, as confirmed by a Media Research Center and Free Speech America investigation.

Roberts’ call to action was inspired by the FBI’s unsettling raid of pro-life activist Mark Houck’s home, and the growing evidence that the FBI is weaponized as a political actor. Houck, acquitted of the charges surrounding the FBI raid, has deemed the FBI’s tactics as terrorism and plans to sue the agency.

Scarborough blatantly misinterpreted Roberts’ stance, accusing him of aiding criminals and even leaders of ISIS, all while attempting to paint conservatives as anti-law and order. He also falsely claimed that The Heritage Foundation’s push against the FBI was a response to investigations into Donald Trump ─ an unnecessary, baseless insinuation.

The Biden Administration’s FBI has targeted pro-lifers, whistleblowers, and has even demonized all conservatives as terrorists and extremists. It is no wonder that The Heritage Foundation is pushing for a dismantling of the FBI, as the administration has tried to falsely categorize them alongside Nazis and extremist organizations.

**In conclusion, Scarborough’s misguided attack on The Heritage Foundation is a testament to the left’s attempt to dominate the narrative in the media. By spreading false information and excluding essential context, the MSNBC host only manages to showcase his own bias, while failing to engage in constructive discourse.**

Source