Next News Network

In a concerning attack on free speech, federal judges, along with the Justice Department and US Federal Bureau of Prisons, are punishing J6 defendants for refusing to renounce their beliefs and speaking out about their mistreatment. Some judges have even added years to sentences in retaliation for J6 defendants exercising their First Amendment rights.

In a shocking turn of events, federal judges are working hand-in-hand with the Justice Department and US Federal Bureau of Prisons to punish J6 defendants for speaking out about the poor treatment they are receiving while detained. These accused individuals, many of whom are awaiting trial or sentencing, are experiencing a gross violation of their First Amendment rights. Speaking to the media or raising funds to cover legal and personal expenses has resulted in additional years being added to their sentences.

This unconstitutional and targeted attack on free speech has provoked outrage from supporters and defense attorneys alike. Criminal defense attorney Steven Metcalf confirmed that one of his clients, Peter Schwartz, received a longer sentence for speaking out. According to Metcalf, DC courts have readjusted the Bail Reform Act specifically for J6 defendants, making it more challenging for these individuals to be released.

This new standard, which has never been used before in bail reform decisions, states that in order for a J6 defendant to receive bond, they must admit that their actions were wrong or express remorse. Unfortunately, this serves as a chilling effect on the free speech rights of many defendants, who face additional years in prison if they do not capitulate to this demand.

One notable example of this trend is the sentencing of Peter Schwartz, who was given an egregious 14-year sentence for pepper-spraying officers during the Jan. 6 protest. During his proceedings, Judge Amit Mehta even issued a statement scolding Schwartz for expressing his political beliefs. In response, veteran criminal defense attorney Norm Pattis argued that Rhodes’ unwavering conviction likely added years to his sentence.

This ongoing attack on the First Amendment rights of J6 defendants is alarming and must not be ignored. Over 90% of these defendants cannot afford private attorneys, and few attorneys are willing to work pro-bono to represent them, resulting in severe financial difficulties for both the accused and their families. As a society, we must stand firmly against the overreach of the judiciary and the erosion of fundamental rights.

In conclusion, the disturbing trend of punishing J6 defendants for exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech is a blatant attack on the very foundation of our democracy. As citizens, we must stand united in the face of government and judicial overreach and protect our fundamental right to speak out without fear of reprisal.

Source