Next News Network

**Large corporations enthusiastically celebrate Pride Month in the US, while curiously choosing to keep their marketing campaigns in the Middle East bland and pride-free. Social media users are quick to point out the glaring inconsistency, provoking questions about the true intentions behind this selective display of support.**

It’s Pride Month in the US, and major corporations are not holding back with their colorful displays of solidarity. However, a stark contrast is observed in the lack of similar enthusiasm within their Middle East marketing efforts. Social media users are noticing and calling out this hypocrisy surrounding the selective promotion of LGBTQ+ rights.

Fox News highlighted the discrepancy in video game developer Bethesda’s marketing campaigns. While Bethesda acknowledged Pride Month in a tweet on June 2, the account representing the Middle East made no reference to it. This isn’t a lone example; multinational corporations like Pfizer also follow this trend, displaying rainbow logos on their social media profiles only in countries like the US, Mexico, and Canada. In contrast, their marketing campaigns in countries like Saudi Arabia seem to have no elements celebrating Pride Month.

This blatant double standard caught the attention of comedian Leo Kearse, who noted that corporations seem to only celebrate Pride “where it makes them money.” It raises questions about whether these companies are genuinely supportive of the LGBTQ+ community or are merely capitalizing on the opportunity to look good in Western countries.

LGBTQ+ individuals in the Middle Eastern countries continue to struggle for basic rights, with Human Rights Watch reporting that government officials actively target them. The situation is dire, and yet, instead of taking a stand and promoting equality, multinational corporations play it safe, choosing to stay out of the conversation. This is not an innocent omission; it is a deliberate and calculated decision to avoid making waves in a region not known for its openness to LGBTQ+ issues.

While activists around the world call for change, multinational corporations hold immense power to influence public perception and spark difficult conversations in regions where LGBTQ+ rights are often dismissed. Yet, they choose to turn a blind eye, maintaining the status quo and staying silent where their voice is needed the most.

Companies pledging support during Pride Month should be held accountable for their actions worldwide, not just where they feel comfortable. Selectively promoting LGBTQ+ rights makes them appear opportunistic rather than genuinely committed to fostering positive change. The fight for equality should be a global effort, and corporations have the authority and resources to make a real impact. The question now is, will they choose to use them?

**In conclusion, the selective nature of multinational corporations’ support for Pride Month raises questions of sincerity and highlights the hypocrisy in their actions. True change will only come when these powerful companies make a definitive stand, promoting equality for all globally, rather than just where they stand to make a profit.**

Source