Geraldo’s Shocking Proposal: Pardon Trump in Exchange for 2024 Exit!

Share on social

Are former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden involved in a secret deal? The controversial suggestion made by Fox News contributor Geraldo Rivera has left the nation divided. Rivera proposes that Biden should pardon Trump in exchange for the former president’s withdrawal from the 2024 race.

Fox News contributor Geraldo Rivera is facing intense backlash after he made a stunning proposal that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. In the wake of former President Donald Trump’s indictment by the Justice Department, Rivera took to Twitter to suggest a quid pro quo arrangement between President Joe Biden and Trump.

Rivera’s tweet read, “As I have said consistently, President Biden should stop this tortured nonsense immediately. In exchange for former President Trump dropping out of the race for the White House, Biden should pardon him for any and all federal allegations.”

This unexpected statement instantly ignited a firestorm of controversy. Supporters and critics of Trump alike were quick to condemn Rivera’s proposition. NYU professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat criticized the tweet, highlighting its lack of coherence and emphasizing that it only serves to showcase unwavering loyalty to Trump.

Others joined in expressing their outrage. Josh Marsh, the founder of Talking Points Memo, called Rivera’s proposal “deeply stupid and morally inane.” He scoffed at the idea of Biden holding a press conference and urging Trump to bow out of the race, labeling Rivera as a “piece of shit” and emphasizing that voters, not elites, decide the country’s leadership.

“People’s Pundit” Rich Baris also slammed Rivera, claiming that his loyalty to Trump blinds him to the real issues at hand. According to Baris, Rivera’s focus on Hunter Biden as an addict rather than a potential bagman for his father undermines his credibility. He accused Rivera of being willing to sell out his own mother for Trump.

Former US Assistant Attorney General Jeff Clark weighed in on the debate, asserting that it would be unconstitutional for the Justice Department to try to force Trump out of the race through criminal penalties. He viewed Rivera’s suggestion as part of an unconstitutional effort to manipulate the electoral process.

The controversy extended beyond Rivera’s remarks. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow raised questions about the Justice Department’s motivations in Trump’s indictment. She speculated on the possibility of a political solution to Trump’s legal woes, wondering if they would seek to prohibit him from running for office again. Maddow drew parallels to the case of Richard Nixon’s Vice President Spiro Agnew, who resigned amid a federal indictment unrelated to the Watergate scandal.

Maddow clarified that she was not advocating for a similar outcome for Trump but emphasized the historical precedent. She argued that Trump’s crimes were not entirely novel and that other politicians had faced similar charges in the past. However, the unique factor in Trump’s case was the Republican Party’s desire to reinstate him in the White House.

The implications of Rivera’s proposal and the ensuing controversy are far-reaching. It exposes the deep divisions within the country and raises questions about loyalty, political maneuvering, and the sanctity of the electoral process. As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen how this will impact the future of American politics.

Geraldo Rivera’s suggestion of a quid pro quo deal between Biden and Trump has ignited a firestorm of debate. With strong backlash from supporters and critics alike, the proposal remains a lightning rod for controversy. As the nation grapples with the implications, the future of American politics hangs in the balance.

Next News Network Team

Next News Network Team

Stay Updated

Get us in your inbox

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy

New & Trending
Latest Videos
Follow us