In a shocking turn of events, former President Donald Trump strikes back! Suing writer E. Jean Carroll for defamation, he refuses to let false accusations tarnish his legacy. This explosive legal battle takes center stage as Trump fights tooth and nail to restore his name.
Former President Donald Trump has taken legal action to defend his reputation against E. Jean Carroll’s defamatory accusations. Trump’s lawyers have filed a counterclaim in New York federal court, underscoring the numerous instances over the years when Carroll accused him of rape. Trump vehemently denies Carroll’s allegations, which she claims occurred in the mid-1990s in a Manhattan department store. It’s crucial to note that Carroll’s claims have never been substantiated or proven in a court of law.
Carroll’s relentless pursuit of Trump led her to file a lawsuit for sexual abuse, resulting in a jury awarding her $5 million in damages last month. The jury’s decision, however, did not find Trump guilty of rape, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting Carroll’s claims. New York’s recent enactment of a law allowed Carroll to sue Trump despite the statute of limitations having expired on her claim.
Trump’s latest counterclaim is part of a separate defamation lawsuit filed in 2019 that is scheduled for trial in January. Seeking at least $10 million in damages, Trump’s legal team aims to challenge the falsehoods propagated by Carroll. The court had previously rejected Trump’s attempt to countersue, but a recent development allowed Carroll to amend her complaint with new comments from Trump himself.
Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, claims that Trump’s filing is nothing more than an attempt to delay accountability for the jury’s previous finding of defamation against him. However, Trump’s actions demonstrate his unwavering commitment to clearing his name and holding Carroll responsible for her baseless allegations. The counterclaim seeks various forms of relief, including retractions, damages, and a denial of the relief sought by Carroll.
Trump’s legal team argues that Carroll’s accusations have caused significant harm to his reputation, resulting in substantial damages. By refusing to accept the jury’s verdict in the previous case, Carroll disregards the findings and insists on perpetuating a narrative that lacks credibility. Trump aims to restore his reputation and demonstrate that Carroll’s claims are unfounded.
As the battle intensifies, it is crucial to scrutinize the evidence behind Carroll’s allegations. Trump firmly maintains his innocence and will continue to fight against these defamatory claims, ensuring that the truth prevails. The upcoming trial in January will be a defining moment, allowing Trump to present his case and expose the fallacies in Carroll’s narrative.
In the face of adversity, former President Donald Trump remains resolute. Filing a counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll, he refuses to let false accusations define his legacy. The battle for truth and justice is imminent, as Trump’s determination to clear his name gains momentum. Stay tuned as this high-stakes legal drama unfolds.
#RubioOnFire exposing NBC's Welker and Media's hushed #BidenLaptopSaga. Erasing biased narratives with TRUTH! Media manipulates,…
CNN's snark fest over GOP in 'Trump Uniform' reeks of bias, while the liberal media's…
UMC goes gay-friendly, membership shrinks. Liberals rejoice, but the flock masses an exodus. Any critics…
Liberal media demonizes GOP - nothing new! They've been at it since before Trump. Don't…
#Politico bellyaching over #FoxNews’s supposed Trump slant while ignoring mainstream media's relentless anti-Trump spin! Hypocrisy…
Nadler suddenly anti-Israel and pro-Hamas? Swap stance shocker: Once against using military aid as leverage,…
View Comments
her story reads like a letter sent to a porn mag
There are so many holes in her case they should have called it the 'Swiss Cheese case'.
1. A supposed rape that happened in the 90's
2. Happened in a Dept. store that had no CCTV back then (convenient)
3. No witnesses (convenient)
4. No complaints filed with the Police, ever!
5. And the jury is just supposed to believe her word that it happened (and they did)
6. The statute of limitations have well and truly expired, but the court allowed it anyway (suss)
7. The corrupt court blocked Trumps attempt to counter sue and prove his innocence (planned)
8. 'Sexual abuse' implies multiple occasions. Not just a one time encounter. ..and again, No witnesses.
They seem to always be able to find a bimbo to do the DS's bidding. All of them appear to be whores, or real whores (willing to do anything for money), which is not Trumps type at all.
This really is just dirty politics from the Deep State and par for the course.