Next News Network

In a controversial move that has raised eyebrows across the National Football League (NFL) and the sports community at large, former Patriots star tight end and NFL legend Rob Gronkowski – fondly known as ‘Gronk’ to followers of the sport – has publicly backed the proposed ban on tackle football for children 12 and under in California. The bill, currently under consideration in the California State Committee on Sports, seeks to put a moratorium on high impact, tackle football for preteens. This is a piece of legislation that some perceive as a chokehold on the future of American football and a significant game-changer for children’s sports in the state.

The mercurial Gronkowski, appearing on Fox Business Network’s “The Claman Countdown” recently, was not just supportive of the proposed ban but emphatically so. “I think it’s a fair proposal, and I’m for it,” he stated, underscoring the notion that football can be “dangerous” for young children. In the ex-NFL star’s opinion, states should be encouraging children to participate in less hazardous sports, like flag football, before they make the transition to tackle football.

Gronkowski went on to champion flag football, exclaiming, “I loved playing flag when I was growing up. To have flag football for kids under 12, I think, is an excellent idea, and I think they shouldn’t be playing tackle football or the real game of football until about seventh grade.” He added that children should be encouraged to engage in multiple sports to hone their overall physical abilities.

The proposed ban met with a dissenting voice in California Governor, Gavin Newsom, who was concerned about the impact on the sport in his state, already seeing declining numbers with a significant drop in young people participating in tackle football – a fall from 103,725 in 2015 to 84,626 in 2022, according to a California Interscholastic Federation’s participation survey. Governor Newsom stated he would veto any such legislation, as he believes a ban is not the answer, despite concerns about the health and safety of young athletes. Instead, he proposed a multi-pronged solution involving consultations with health and sports medicine experts, coaches, parents, and community members.

However, Gronkowski’s support of this proposed restriction raises an interesting and complex question about the future of professional football. The former NFL star’s endorsement of the ban highlights the tension between encouraging America’s pastime and protecting the next generation of athletes. Despite being revered for his on-field prowess and aggressive style of play, Gronkowski’s endorsement could potentially influence other states to rethink their approach towards youth football.

The concluding question remains: Could this ban, if passed, diminish the popularity and future prospects of American football? While it’s too early to determine the lasting effects, it’s evident that Gronkowski’s stand is a game-changing statement that will inspire thoughtful debate about youth participation in high-impact sports. The cost to the game, if any, will play out in the seasons to come.