Next News Network

Hook: “BBC’s Helena Humphrey, known for forming firm viewpoints on topics she is not familiar with, dropped the ball spectacularly in a recent interview with former IDF spokesperson Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus. She asked, with a straight face, why Israeli hostage rescuers didn’t ring up Hamas to announce their arrival. Although a laughable question, Conricus tactfully pointed out the obvious pitfalls such a strategy would result in.”

The naiveté of the question speaks volumes about Humphrey’s understanding of military operations during wartime scenarios. Conricus patiently explained that tipping off terrorist groups would result in them executing the very hostages the IDF were attempting to rescue. This concept should be elementary, and yet, Humphrey seemingly missed the memo.

Israel found itself closed in combat with Hamas, responding to assaults from not only gunfire and RPGs, but also anti-aircraft missiles. Yet Humphrey, and those of a similar mindset, ask whether Israel should just absorb such hostilities without retaliation. The audacity of this line of thinking is breathtaking.

Israel is forced onto the battleground, not having chosen this path. The ideal situation for Israel would be to fight Hamas out in open spaces, limiting the risk to innocent civilians. Furthermore, Israel certainly did not desire the initial act of violence from Hamas that incurred the loss of Israeli lives and resulted in the hostage situation.

But Humphrey and her ilk seem to place the onus of casualties on Israel. It begs the question – is Israel expected to politely decline Hamas’s violence? Is the nation required to put up a white flag every time a terrorist group, clutching hostages, decides to declare war?

The BBC, commonly celebrated by left-leaning crowds as the Titan of journalistic practice, has not held up well in reporting on the Israel-Hamas War. It has gone far enough to integrate an unmistakable anti-Israel bias into its coverage of the war. Such prejudice does not hold up in objective reporting and has subsequently led to the BBC issuing numerous apologies for their ill-reporting on the conflict.

This is probably why Israeli comedians regularly lampoon the BBC. Its bias has become so evident and tiresome that it now serves as fodder for comedic sketches in Israel. Some say the mockery represents dark humor, a way for the Israeli public to cope with skewed media representation and the war.

Conclusion: The next time Humphrey or any other reporter raises an eyebrow at the way Israel fights off violent aggression from terrorism, it would do them well to understand the harsh realities of skirmishes. Uninformed opinions can be not just misleading but harmful. War doesn’t allow for the luxury of a time-out, and that’s a fact the BBC and its audience should come to terms with.

SOURCE