The mask has finally come off. Jack Smith's deposition testimony has exposed what patriotic Americans suspected all along—his relentless persecution of President Trump wasn't about "justice" or "accountability." It was a calculated attack on the fundamental right to free speech that every American holds dear.
Smith's own words reveal a prosecutor who held nothing but contempt for the First Amendment protections that separate America from banana republics. When pressed about his unprecedented charges against a former president, Smith's responses showed a man who viewed political speech itself as criminal activity.
This isn't just about Trump, folks. This is about whether any American can speak freely about election integrity, challenge government narratives, or question official results without facing the full weight of a weaponized justice system.
The Real Target Was Always Free Speech
Smith's deposition makes crystal clear that his office viewed protected political speech as evidence of criminal intent. Think about that for a moment—a federal prosecutor treating constitutionally protected expression as proof of guilt. This is the kind of prosecutorial overreach our Founding Fathers warned us about.
"Smith's testimony betrayed his utter disdain for the fundamental right to freedom of speech enshrined in the First Amendment,"
Every parent who speaks out at a school board meeting, every citizen who questions election procedures, every American who dares to challenge the approved narrative—all of them were potential targets in Smith's authoritarian playbook.
Thank God President Trump is back in the White House, dismantling the weaponized bureaucracy that enabled this constitutional assault. But we must never forget how close we came to losing our most precious freedoms to partisan prosecutors drunk on power.
The question every American should be asking: If they can come for a former president's free speech rights, what's stopping them from coming for yours next?