An Israeli tech billionaire is making headlines for all the wrong reasons after publicly calling for limits on the First Amendment rights of American citizens. Shlomo Kramer, co-founder of cybersecurity giant Cato Networks, sparked massive outrage when he suggested it's time to "limit the First Amendment" to supposedly protect it.
Let that sink in, patriots. A foreign national who doesn't even live in America thinks he has the right to tell us how to handle our Constitution. This is exactly the kind of globalist overreach that President Trump has been warning us about for years.
The backlash on social media has been swift and brutal. One angry American summed it up perfectly: "IDIOT @Shlomo_Kramer - Israeli tech Billionaire wants #AMERICANS STRIPPED of Their 1st_Amendment RIGHTS -- NOT his Country a NON-CITIZEN -- who lives in #Israel ~ where they have 'FREEDOM of SPEECH' F#CK!NG HIPPOCRITE."
And they're absolutely right. This is the height of hypocrisy.
Big Tech Surveillance King Wants to Control Speech
What makes this even more disturbing is Kramer's background. As Betar USA pointed out on social media, this is "the man behind some of the world's most powerful cyber-surveillance" technology. So not only does he want to limit what Americans can say, but he also has the tools to monitor and track it.
Does anyone else see the problem here? We're supposed to trust a foreign billionaire with surveillance capabilities to decide what speech is acceptable for American citizens?
This story is blowing up across social platforms, with one user noting: "Israeli Tech Billionaire Sparks Outrage After Calling for Limits on the First Amendment in the U.S." The anger is real, and it's justified.
The timing couldn't be more telling. As President Trump begins his second term with a mandate to restore American sovereignty and constitutional rights, foreign elites are getting nervous about losing their influence over our political discourse.
Here's the bottom line: No foreign billionaire gets to lecture Americans about our Constitution. The First Amendment isn't a suggestion – it's the foundation of our republic. And it's certainly not up for negotiation by someone who doesn't even live here.
What do you think, patriots? Should foreign nationals have any say in how we interpret our Bill of Rights?