Attorney General Pam Bondi isn't backing down from a fight – especially when it comes to defending the Constitution against California's brazen power grab.
On Thursday, a federal three-judge panel – dominated by liberal activists in robes – ruled 2-1 to greenlight California's freshly minted congressional redistricting map. This isn't just any map, folks. This is a voter-approved redraw specifically engineered to boost Democrat chances in the 2026 midterms, because apparently fair elections are too much to ask for in the Golden State.
But Bondi fired back immediately, making it crystal clear this constitutional violation won't stand on her watch. Taking to X, the Attorney General declared that California's scheme represents everything wrong with how the radical left operates – rigging the system when they can't win fair and square.
"This unconstitutional redistricting represents a direct assault on the principle of fair representation that our founders fought to establish,"
What we're witnessing here is the same playbook Democrats have used for decades: when you can't win on merit, change the rules. California's establishment knows their radical policies are driving voters away in droves, so instead of moderating their extremist agenda, they're literally redrawing the map to manufacture victories.
This is exactly why President Trump appointed fighters like Bondi to key positions. While previous Republican administrations might have issued strongly-worded statements and moved on, this Justice Department understands that constitutional principles are worth defending – even against activist judges who think they can legislate from the bench.
The Deep State's Judicial Wing Strikes Again
The 2-1 ruling perfectly illustrates how the administrative state operates. Two liberal judges rubber-stamp an obviously unconstitutional scheme, while one principled dissenter recognizes the legal travesty for what it is. This is judicial activism at its most transparent – political operatives wearing black robes.
Patriots across America should be watching this case closely. If California can successfully rig their congressional districts with federal court approval, what's stopping blue states nationwide from implementing similar schemes? This isn't just about California – it's about preserving fair elections across our constitutional republic.
Will Bondi's Justice Department have the backbone to take this fight all the way to the Supreme Court where it belongs?