Politics

RADICAL Judge Moves to SABOTAGE Trump's ICE Operations as Deportation Campaign Launches

Gary FranchiJanuary 15, 2026149 views
RADICAL Judge Moves to SABOTAGE Trump's ICE Operations as Deportation Campaign Launches
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

A federal judge in Minnesota is weighing whether to impose crippling restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations just as President Trump's promised mass deportation campaign kicks into high gear—and the proposed limitations could literally put ICE agents' lives at risk.

The lawsuit, Tincher v. Noem, was filed in December by Minneapolis residents who are essentially asking the court to tie ICE agents' hands behind their backs during what may be the most critical immigration enforcement operation in American history. The timing is no coincidence, Patriots.

According to reports, the proposed restrictions could prevent ICE officers from defending themselves in dangerous situations—a stunning example of how the radical left prioritizes the comfort of illegal aliens over the safety of our law enforcement heroes.

Deep State Judges Strike Again

This is exactly the kind of judicial activism that President Trump warned us about. While everyday Americans voted overwhelmingly for secure borders and immigration enforcement, unelected federal judges are trying to override the will of the people from their ivory towers.

The case comes as ICE agents are preparing for the largest deportation operation in decades, fulfilling Trump's core campaign promise to remove criminal aliens and restore law and order to our communities. But instead of supporting our brave ICE officers, these Minneapolis residents—likely backed by well-funded leftist groups—are running to Obama-appointed judges to obstruct justice.

Putting Politics Over Public Safety

What's truly outrageous is that these proposed restrictions could compromise agents' ability to protect themselves and innocent bystanders during enforcement actions. When you're dealing with potentially dangerous individuals who have already broken our immigration laws, you don't handcuff the good guys.

This is the same playbook Democrats used throughout Trump's first term—forum shopping for activist judges willing to block common-sense immigration enforcement at every turn.

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and the entire Trump administration must fight this tooth and nail. The American people didn't elect Trump to watch ICE operations get sabotaged by radical judges and their leftist allies.

Will our courts finally respect the rule of law, or will they continue protecting illegal aliens at the expense of American safety?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

S
SmallTownUSAVerifiedjust now
My community has been dealing with this crisis for years while DC elites ignored us. Finally someone is taking action and now they want to stop it?
P
PatriotMom2024Verifiedjust now
This is exactly what we voted AGAINST! These activist judges think they can override the will of the people.
C
ConstitutionFirstVerifiedjust now
100% agree! The separation of powers exists for a reason - judges need to stay in their lane.
W
WorkingDad03Verifiedjust now
How is enforcing existing immigration law considered radical? The only radical thing here is ignoring the law for political purposes.
C
CommonSense2024Verifiedjust now
Exactly! Following the law is now somehow controversial according to these people.
V
VeteranVoterVerifiedjust now
These judges were probably appointed by Obama or Biden. Time to clean house in the judiciary too.
F
FreedomFighter88Verifiedjust now
Trump needs to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. We can't let one activist judge derail border security.
A
AmericaFirst2025Verifiedjust now
WINNING! Trump is delivering on his promises despite the deep state resistance.
T
TexasRancher47Verifiedjust now
I live on the border and see the impact daily. We NEED these ICE operations to work without interference from partisan judges.
L
LegalEagle1776Verifiedjust now
Can someone explain what legal authority this judge thinks they have to interfere with federal immigration enforcement? This seems like clear judicial overreach to me.
R
RetiredCopVerifiedjust now
They don't have authority - they're making it up as they go along. Same playbook as 2016-2020.