The New York Times has some explaining to do. The paper that claims to print "all the news that's fit to print" has been selectively editing the truth when it comes to one of their favorite anti-Israel sources from Gaza.
Meet Hussam Abu Safyia, the Gaza doctor who has become the Times' go-to voice for painting Israel as genocidal monsters. In October 2023 and December 2024, the Times gave this man prime real estate in their opinion section, allowing him to spin tales of Israeli "war crimes" to their credulous readership.
But here's what the Times doesn't want you to know: there are serious questions about Safyia's credibility and potential terrorist connections that would completely undermine their carefully crafted narrative.
The Media's Favorite "Witness"
According to PJ Media's investigation, a significant portion of what the world believes about the so-called "genocide" in Gaza comes directly from Safyia's dramatic accounts. His guest essays provided "lurid, gritty details" of supposed Israeli atrocities that had Times readers clutching their pearls.
But the Times conveniently left out key biographical information that might have made readers think twice about taking this man at his word. Why would America's "paper of record" omit crucial context about their star witness?
"A good deal of what the world thinks it knows about the supposed 'genocide' in Gaza is due to the efforts of Hussam Abu Safyia," the PJ Media report reveals.
This is exactly the kind of journalistic malpractice that has destroyed trust in mainstream media. The Times isn't interested in giving readers the full picture—they're interested in pushing an anti-Israel agenda, even if it means platforming questionable sources.
Pattern of Deception
This isn't just sloppy journalism—it's deliberate propaganda. The Times knows exactly what they're doing when they elevate certain voices while burying inconvenient facts. They're counting on their readers not to dig deeper or ask tough questions.
How many other "credible witnesses" has the Times promoted without proper vetting? How many anti-Israel narratives have they pushed based on questionable sources? Patriots deserve better than this journalistic fraud masquerading as news.