In a stunning display of the two-tiered justice system that continues to plague America, a grand jury has rejected the Department of Justice's effort to indict Democratic lawmakers who openly urged military members to ignore what they called "illegal orders" from their commanders.
The decision represents yet another example of how Democrats can seemingly incite insubordination within our military ranks without facing any real consequences, while conservatives face the full weight of federal prosecution for far lesser offenses.
These Democratic lawmakers actively encouraged members of our armed forces to break their oath of military discipline and pick and choose which orders to follow based on their personal political beliefs. This is nothing short of encouraging mutiny within the ranks – behavior that would have resulted in court martial for any service member.
Where's the Equal Justice?
Patriots across America are asking the obvious question: if this were Republican lawmakers urging military defiance during a Democratic administration, would the outcome be the same? We all know the answer.
The grand jury's refusal to indict sends a dangerous message that Democrats can undermine military discipline and chain of command without accountability. This sets a precedent that could fundamentally damage the good order and discipline that keeps our military the most effective fighting force in the world.
"This is exactly the kind of selective enforcement that Americans are sick and tired of. One set of rules for Democrats, another for everyone else."
While President Trump works to restore strength and respect to our military after years of woke policies and politicization, Democrats continue their efforts to weaponize and divide our armed forces along partisan lines.
The American people deserve to know: will there ever be accountability for those who seek to turn our military into a political weapon? Or will the swamp continue protecting its own while everyday Americans face prosecution for standing up for their constitutional rights?
