The Department of Justice has reached new levels of absurdity in their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, naming legendary rock singer Janis Joplin—who died in 1970, two years before Epstein was even born—among 300 high-profile figures in their latest disclosure to Congress.
Even Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna of California couldn't stomach this obvious attempt at obstruction, accusing the DOJ of "muddying the waters" with Saturday's six-page letter that mixed legitimate names with completely irrelevant figures like the late Woodstock icon.
This latest stunt raises serious questions: What is the Deep State trying to hide? Why include a singer who died decades before Epstein's criminal enterprise even began? The answer is crystal clear—they're deliberately contaminating the legitimate investigation with garbage data to protect their cronies.
"This is exactly the kind of bureaucratic games Americans are sick and tired of," one congressional source told reporters. "They're treating this like a joke when real victims deserve answers."
The timing couldn't be more suspicious. Just as President Trump's Justice Department reforms are gaining momentum and the American people are demanding transparency about elite corruption networks, career bureaucrats are pulling every dirty trick in the book to muddy the waters.
Patriots have been fighting for years to get the full truth about Epstein's client list and the powerful figures who enabled his trafficking operation. Instead of transparency, we get Janis Joplin's name thrown into the mix like some sick bureaucratic prank.
The Cover-Up Continues
This isn't incompetence—it's intentional sabotage. The same DOJ that spent years targeting President Trump and everyday Americans is now playing games with one of the most serious investigations involving elite pedophile networks in modern history.
How many more diversionary tactics will the administrative state deploy before the American people get the justice they deserve? And more importantly, which living, breathing criminals are they desperately trying to protect by turning this investigation into a circus?