Business

EXPOSED: Google's Waymo Robotaxis So Broken They Need HUMAN Door-Closers

Gary FranchiFebruary 15, 2026173 views
EXPOSED: Google's Waymo Robotaxis So Broken They Need HUMAN Door-Closers
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

The future of transportation, according to Big Tech elites, is apparently paying minimum-wage workers to babysit broken robots. Google's Waymo has quietly started hiring DoorDash gig workers and other freelancers for one simple task: following around their supposedly "revolutionary" self-driving cars to close doors left open by passengers.

Yes, you read that correctly. These multi-million dollar autonomous vehicles - the same technology that Silicon Valley promised would replace human drivers - can't even figure out how to close their own doors when customers forget to do it.

The robotaxis become completely immobilized when a door is left ajar, forcing the company to deploy an army of human workers to manually shut them. It's a perfect metaphor for everything wrong with the tech industry's arrogant promises about artificial intelligence replacing American workers.

Another Big Tech Promise Falls Flat

This embarrassing revelation exposes the gap between Silicon Valley's grandiose claims and reality. For years, Google and other tech giants have pushed the narrative that AI and automation would seamlessly replace human jobs across entire industries. Meanwhile, they can't even build a car that knows when its door is open.

The irony is rich: a technology designed to eliminate driving jobs is now creating new jobs for people to follow cars around and perform basic tasks that any human driver would handle automatically. It's almost like human intelligence and common sense aren't so easy to replicate after all.

While Waymo burns through investor cash paying people to close car doors, American families are struggling with inflation and job security. These are the same tech companies that lecture us about progress and efficiency while wasting resources on half-baked solutions to problems that don't exist.

This latest Waymo fiasco should serve as a wake-up call about the limitations of AI hype. Maybe instead of trying to replace American workers with faulty robots, these companies should focus on building technology that actually works. What's next - hiring people to remind the cars which direction to drive?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (8)

Leave a Comment

F
FreeMarketRealistVerifiedjust now
I'm all for innovation and private enterprise, but this seems like a massive waste of resources. How much are they paying these door-closers per hour? Meanwhile, regular taxi drivers who can actually drive AND close doors are being put out of work.
S
SmallBizOwnerVerifiedjust now
Great point about the taxi drivers. This whole industry is built on destroying jobs for working Americans.
P
PragmaticThinkerVerifiedjust now
This raises serious questions about what other 'minor' issues these companies aren't disclosing. If door sensors are failing, what about the safety-critical systems we can't see?
P
PatriotDriverVerifiedjust now
So much for the AI revolution! They need humans to close car doors but want us to believe they can navigate traffic safely.
A
AmericaFirst2024Verifiedjust now
Google can't even run a search engine without bias, and now we're supposed to trust them with transportation?
T
TechSkeptic47Verifiedjust now
This is exactly why I don't trust these Silicon Valley promises about autonomous vehicles being ready for prime time. If they can't even get the doors to work properly, how can we trust them with our lives on the road?
C
CommonSenseConservativeVerifiedjust now
Absolutely right. These tech companies are pushing half-baked products just to beat competitors to market.
C
ConstitutionalCarGuyVerifiedjust now
Tried one of these Waymo cars in Phoenix last month - the thing took 10 minutes to figure out how to make a simple right turn. Now I find out they can't even handle basic mechanical functions?