Delaware Governor Matt Meyer just revealed everything you need to know about how Democrats operate in 2026. On Friday's broadcast of C-SPAN's "Ceasefire," this delusional Democrat had the audacity to claim that his party's demands to end the Department of Homeland Security shutdown represent "a compromise."
Let that sink in, Patriots. Democrats are literally holding our nation's homeland security apparatus hostage, making demands while our border remains under siege, and they have the nerve to call their ultimatums a "compromise."
When host Greta Brawner pressed Meyer about the Democratic demands, the Delaware governor doubled down on this Orwellian doublespeak. This is the same party that spent four years undermining border security, defunding ICE operations, and rolling out the red carpet for illegal aliens under the failed Biden regime.
The Left's Definition of 'Compromise'
Here's what Democrats consider a "compromise" these days: They make outrageous demands, refuse to negotiate in good faith, then claim they're being reasonable when they offer to accept slightly less than their maximum ask. Meanwhile, hardworking Americans watch their tax dollars get flushed down the drain on woke policies and administrative bloat.
"This is exactly the kind of swamp thinking that President Trump was elected to drain," said one conservative analyst. "Democrats create the crisis, then demand concessions to solve the crisis they created."
The Trump-Vance administration has made it crystal clear that securing our homeland is non-negotiable. While Democrats play political games with national security, President Trump continues his mission to complete the border wall, execute mass deportations of illegal aliens, and restore sanity to our immigration system.
Governor Meyer's comments perfectly illustrate why voters rejected the Democratic agenda so decisively in 2024. Americans are tired of being lectured by coastal elites who think holding national security hostage is somehow "reasonable."
The question every patriotic American should be asking is this: If Democrats consider these demands a "compromise," what exactly was their starting position? And why should we trust a party that treats our homeland security as a bargaining chip?