Politics

EXPOSED: Democrat Candidate REFUSES to Name Single Illegal He'd Deport

Gary FranchiFebruary 22, 202681 views
EXPOSED: Democrat Candidate REFUSES to Name Single Illegal He'd Deport
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

When asked a straightforward question about deportations, Tennessee Democrat congressional candidate Justin Pearson twisted himself into rhetorical knots rather than give a direct answer — perfectly exposing the radical left's complete opposition to enforcing immigration law.

During a recent interview, Pearson was asked point-blank to name even one category of illegal alien he would support deporting. His response? A verbal tightrope act that would make circus performers jealous.

Instead of answering the question, Pearson immediately pivoted to attacking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), claiming that no one in President Trump's administration could be "trusted" to handle deportations. Classic Democrat deflection — when you can't defend your position, attack the messenger.

The Party of Open Borders Revealed

Pearson's refusal to name even violent criminals or repeat offenders for deportation reveals everything Americans need to know about today's Democrat Party. They've moved so far left that they can't even support removing dangerous criminals from our communities.

This is the same radical mindset that gave us Biden's disastrous border policies for four years. While Trump is working to secure our borders and protect American families, Democrats like Pearson are still playing word games and protecting illegal aliens over law-abiding citizens.

"The American people deserve representatives who will put their safety first, not politicians who can't even admit that some people shouldn't be in our country illegally."

Pearson's anti-ICE rhetoric is particularly telling. These are the brave men and women working to remove dangerous criminals from our streets, yet Democrats treat them like the enemy. It's backwards priorities that put ideology over public safety.

Trump's Deportation Success

Meanwhile, President Trump's mass deportation program continues delivering results for the American people. While Democrats perform verbal gymnastics to avoid supporting law enforcement, Trump is actually solving the immigration crisis Biden created.

Tennessee voters deserve better than a candidate who can't give a straight answer about protecting their communities. When your position is so extreme you can't even name violent criminals for removal, maybe it's time to find a new position — preferably in the private sector.

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (9)

Leave a Comment

B
BorderStateResidentVerifiedjust now
I live in Arizona and see the impact firsthand - drug trafficking, human smuggling, you name it. Yet politicians like this refuse to acknowledge we need enforcement priorities.
S
SmallTownVoterVerifiedjust now
Unbelievable! Can't even name ONE person who should be deported.
R
RetiredCopVerifiedjust now
I spent 25 years in law enforcement and we always had priorities for who to arrest first - violent criminals, repeat offenders, etc. Why is immigration enforcement any different?
C
ConstitutionFirstVerifiedjust now
What's the point of having immigration laws if we're not going to enforce them? This candidate clearly doesn't believe in the rule of law.
L
LegalImmigrant2019Verifiedjust now
As someone who came here legally, this frustrates me so much. Why did I bother following the process?
P
PatriotMom58Verifiedjust now
This is exactly why we can't trust these politicians! They want open borders but won't admit it publicly.
T
TexasStrongVerifiedjust now
Absolutely right. They know their real agenda is unpopular so they dodge every direct question.
A
AmericaFirst2024Verifiedjust now
This is why Trump's direct approach resonates with so many voters. At least he'll give you a straight answer on tough issues.
F
FiscalConservativeVerifiedjust now
How can we have a serious discussion about immigration policy when candidates won't even engage with basic questions about enforcement?