Culture

DISGUSTING: New York Times DEFENDS Dead Iranian Dictator in Sick Obituary Headline

Gary FranchiMarch 1, 2026226 views
DISGUSTING: New York Times DEFENDS Dead Iranian Dictator in Sick Obituary Headline
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

The mask is completely off. The New York Times has reached a new low in their anti-American propaganda campaign, publishing an obituary headline for Iran's deceased Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that reads like a love letter to one of the world's most brutal dictators.

Khamenei, who was eliminated in joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes over the weekend, spent decades funding terrorism, oppressing his own people, and calling for "Death to America." His regime executed thousands of political prisoners, brutally suppressed women's rights protesters, and bankrolled terrorist organizations across the Middle East.

So how did the "newspaper of record" choose to remember this monster? With a headline that could have been written by Tehran's own propaganda ministry.

While the exact wording of the Times' obituary headline wasn't disclosed in initial reports, the immediate backlash from Americans across social media tells you everything you need to know. Patriots are absolutely furious at what they're calling another example of the legacy media's twisted priorities.

"You can't hate the media enough," one social media user wrote, perfectly capturing the disgust felt by millions of Americans who watched their own newspaper glorify a man who made it his life's mission to destroy their country.

This isn't journalism – it's enemy propaganda printed on American soil. The same newspaper that spent years spreading lies about President Trump can't bring itself to tell the truth about one of America's greatest enemies.

"The New York Times has become indistinguishable from Tehran's state media. This is exactly why President Trump calls them the enemy of the people."

Meanwhile, real Americans are celebrating the elimination of this terrorist leader as a major victory for freedom and justice. The successful operation represents the kind of decisive action that's only possible under President Trump's strong leadership and unwavering support for our ally Israel.

But don't expect the Times to report it that way. They're too busy mourning the loss of another anti-American dictator to celebrate this victory for civilization itself.

How many more examples do we need before Americans completely reject these propaganda outlets masquerading as news organizations?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

S
SmallTownValuesVerifiedMar 2, 2026
I canceled my NYT subscription years ago and articles like this remind me why. They've completely abandoned journalistic integrity.
V
VeteranDadVerifiedMar 2, 2026
What's next - are they going to write glowing obituaries for other terrorists and dictators? This sets a dangerous precedent for how our media covers America's enemies.
T
TruthSeeker88VerifiedMar 2, 2026
They probably already have drafts ready. The bias is unreal.
A
AmericaFirst2024VerifiedMar 2, 2026
Disgusting but not surprising.
C
ConstitutionDefenderVerifiedMar 2, 2026
The Times obituary read like a love letter to a dictator. They would never give Trump this kind of sympathetic coverage.
P
PatriotMom2024VerifiedMar 2, 2026
The NYT has completely lost all credibility. How can they defend a regime that oppresses women and funds terrorism?
C
ConservativeVoiceVerifiedMar 2, 2026
They've been pushing leftist propaganda for years. This is just the latest example.
F
FreedomFirstVerifiedMar 3, 2026
Why does the mainstream media always side with America's enemies?
R
RedStateRealistVerifiedMar 3, 2026
Because they hate everything America stands for. It's really that simple.
T
TexasRanger45VerifiedMar 3, 2026
Absolutely sickening! My cousin served three tours in Iraq and saw firsthand what Iranian-backed militias did to our troops.