Kamala Harris just can't seem to pick a winner. The failed 2024 presidential candidate made her grand return to campaign politics by endorsing Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the Texas Democratic Senate primary—only to watch her handpicked candidate crash and burn as voters chose state representative James Talarico instead.
In a move that perfectly encapsulates the Democrats' disconnect with their own base, Harris threw her "full support" behind the wrong horse, proving once again that her political instincts are about as sharp as a butter knife. Despite backing the losing candidate, Harris had the audacity to claim the Tuesday primary results showed the party was "energized like never before" and ready to "achieve something historic."
Historic? The only thing historic here is Harris's ability to consistently back losers.
Social media users wasted no time mocking Harris's latest political miscalculation. "Hahaha loser!" posted one user on Twitter, sharing news of Harris's failed endorsement. The sentiment echoed across conservative circles, with many pointing out the pattern of failure following the former VP's political touch.
"HAHA! Cardi B's now 2 for 2 on her Democrat endorsements… first Kamala Harris, then Jasmine Crockett and BOTH of them lost their elections! At this point, we should hire Cardi B to continue endorsing more Democrats and keep this streak going!"
The comparison to rapper Cardi B's endorsement record struck a nerve, highlighting how even celebrity backing couldn't save Harris's political judgment—or her chosen candidates.
This latest embarrassment raises serious questions about Harris's relevance within the Democratic Party. If she can't even read the room in her own party's primary, how can Democrats trust her to lead anything? Texas voters clearly saw through the establishment pick and chose their own path.
As Trump's second term continues to deliver wins for America, Democrats are stuck with leaders who can't even win their own primaries. Maybe it's time for Harris to consider a different career path—one that doesn't involve picking winners and losers.