Politics

TERROR STRIKES: DHS Shutdown Enables Four Attacks as RINO Rogers Splits With America First

Gary FranchiMarch 15, 2026194 views
TERROR STRIKES: DHS Shutdown Enables Four Attacks as RINO Rogers Splits With America First
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

America has been hit with four suspected terror attacks during the Department of Homeland Security funding shutdown, creating a national security crisis that's exposing which Republicans truly stand with President Trump's America First agenda versus the swamp establishment.

The attacks have created a political firestorm in Michigan's heated Senate race, where Republican candidate Mike Rogers – a former congressman with deep ties to the intelligence community – is breaking ranks with conservative hardliners by supporting immediate DHS funding restoration.

But here's the question Patriots need to ask: Why should we reward a department that has spent years targeting American citizens while failing at its core mission of protecting our homeland?

The Swamp Strikes Back

Rogers' position puts him squarely in opposition to the growing America First movement that recognizes DHS has become a weaponized arm of the administrative state. Under the Biden regime, this department targeted parents at school board meetings, surveilled conservative Americans, and turned our own government against We the People.

"We cannot allow partisan politics to compromise our national security," Rogers stated, echoing the same establishment talking points we've heard for decades while our borders remained wide open and real threats were ignored.

Meanwhile, true conservative candidates are asking the hard questions: How did these terror attacks happen on DHS's watch? Why should taxpayers continue funding a department that has proven more interested in targeting Trump supporters than actual terrorists?

America First vs. Swamp First

This crisis perfectly illustrates the choice facing Republican voters across the nation. Do we continue propping up failed institutions that serve the deep state, or do we demand real reform that puts American security first?

President Trump campaigned on dismantling the administrative state for good reason. These agencies have shown they cannot be trusted with the safety and freedom of the American people.

The terror attacks are tragic, but they reveal a hard truth: throwing more money at a broken system won't make us safer. Real security comes from strong borders, effective immigration enforcement, and agencies that serve America – not the globalist agenda.

Will Republican voters choose swamp creatures like Rogers who want to restore the status quo, or will they demand candidates who understand that our government needs complete restructuring? The choice couldn't be clearer.

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

V
VeteranForTruthVerified34 minutes ago
Served two tours overseas fighting these same threats, only to watch RINOs invite them in through the back door.
S
SupportOurTroopsVerifiedjust now
Thank you for your service! This betrayal of our security is heartbreaking.
C
ConstitutionDefenderVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain how this DHS shutdown actually enabled these specific attacks? Want to understand the timeline better.
A
AmericaFirstAlwaysVerifiedjust now
Four attacks that could have been prevented with proper DHS funding. Blood on their hands!
T
TruthSeeker45Verifiedjust now
This is what happens when politics comes before public safety. Shameful.
R
RedStateRealistVerifiedjust now
Primary season can't come fast enough. Time to clean house of these establishment Republicans who don't represent us.
B
BorderStateResidentVerifiedjust now
I live 20 miles from the border and see the chaos firsthand every day. These politicians voting against security funding have no idea what we're dealing with down here.
P
PatriotMom2024Verifiedjust now
This is exactly what we warned would happen! When you defund border security and ignore America First policies, our enemies see it as an open invitation.
T
TexasDefenderVerifiedjust now
Absolutely right. We've been saying this for months - weakness invites aggression.
C
ConservativeVoter88Verifiedjust now
Rogers needs to explain himself to his constituents. How can you call yourself a Republican and vote against national security?