Politics

BRILLIANT: GOP Senator Calls for PRIVATIZING TSA and Air Traffic Control to END Government Incompetence

Gary FranchiMarch 19, 2026392 views
BRILLIANT: GOP Senator Calls for PRIVATIZING TSA and Air Traffic Control to END Government Incompetence
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) is making waves with a common-sense proposal that should have been implemented decades ago: privatize the TSA and air traffic control to end the endless cycle of government incompetence plaguing American travelers.

Speaking on Fox Business Network's "The Bottom Line" Wednesday, Johnson argued that the Transportation Security Administration should have been set up as a privately contracted operation from day one, preventing the kind of disruptive failures we're seeing today.

"The TSA should be privately contracted," Johnson stated, highlighting what should be obvious to anyone who's endured the security theater nightmare at American airports. "Air traffic control should be privatized as well."

Government Monopoly = Government Failure

Johnson's proposal isn't radical - it's basic economics. When you have a government monopoly with zero competition and zero accountability, you get exactly what Americans experience every time they fly: long lines, rude agents, security failures, and systems that collapse at the first sign of trouble.

Countries like Canada, the UK, and Germany have successfully privatized their air traffic control systems, resulting in better service, lower costs, and improved safety records. But here in America, we're stuck with bloated federal bureaucracies that treat passengers like cattle.

"Private contractors have to compete for business and deliver results, unlike federal agencies that get bigger budgets every time they fail," a transportation industry insider told us.

This is exactly the kind of thinking the Trump-Vance administration needs to embrace as part of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. Why are we paying federal employees to provide subpar service when private companies could do it better, faster, and cheaper?

Time to Drain This Swamp

Johnson's proposal exposes the fundamental problem with big government: when there's no competition, there's no incentive to improve. TSA agents know they can't be fired for poor performance, and air traffic controllers operate in a system immune to market pressures.

Patriots, this is about more than just airport convenience - it's about whether we want efficient, accountable services or bloated bureaucracies that answer to no one. Senator Johnson is showing real leadership by challenging the status quo that benefits government unions at the expense of everyday Americans.

Isn't it time we stopped accepting government mediocrity and started demanding the world-class service that private enterprise delivers?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (5)

Leave a Comment

A
AviationEnthusiastVerifiedMar 20, 2026
This makes total sense - look at how much better FedEx and UPS run compared to USPS. But what about security standards? Would private companies still have to follow the same federal regulations for screening?
F
FreemarketFanVerifiedMar 20, 2026
Private companies would probably exceed government standards because their reputation and contracts would be on the line. Government workers have no incentive to perform.
T
TaxpayerFirstVerifiedMar 21, 2026
About time! Last month I waited 2 hours in a TSA line at Atlanta while half the screening lanes sat empty because they were 'understaffed.' Private companies would never survive with that kind of customer service.
P
PatriotMike2024VerifiedMar 21, 2026
FINALLY! Someone with the backbone to call out this bloated government mess. I've been saying for years that privatizing TSA would make airports run like actual businesses instead of DMV-style nightmares.
C
ConservativeRealistVerifiedMar 21, 2026
Exactly right! Competition breeds excellence, government monopolies breed incompetence.