In a jaw-dropping display of misplaced priorities, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) went on CNN Monday to propose giving the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an "ironclad guarantee" that America and Israel won't attack them. But it gets worse – this California Democrat wants China and Russia involved in the deal.
During his CNN appearance, Khanna suggested the U.S. should "make sure that we give Iran an ironclad guarantee that Israel or we will not attack" and advocated for involving our greatest geopolitical rivals in negotiations to ensure Iran is "going to be safe."
Let that sink in, Patriots. While President Trump works to restore American strength on the world stage, Democrats like Khanna want to tie our hands and give guarantees to a regime that has American blood on its hands.
Americans React With Outrage
The backlash was swift and brutal. Twitter user @jdibert87 captured what millions of Americans are thinking: "What is IRAN first giving America? Nothing. Bomb them to Hell where they belong. Always Remember.. they murdered 40,000."
Another user, @ClarkGary18198, dismissed Khanna entirely: "Who? And why should we care?" – a sentiment shared by Americans tired of fringe Democrats getting airtime for their America-last proposals.
@DonCamp29856335 connected the dots to past failures: "So his solution is to leave the same guys in charge and negotiate another Iran Nuclear Deal. Like the last one?"
Same Failed Playbook
This sounds eerily familiar to the disastrous Iran Nuclear Deal that President Trump rightfully scrapped in his first term. Now we're supposed to trust the same regime that funds terrorism across the Middle East, provides weapons to Russia for use against Ukraine, and continues to chant "Death to America"?
While Trump's team works to project strength and restore deterrence, Democrats like Khanna want to hand Iran everything they want on a silver platter – with guarantees backed by China and Russia, no less.
Is this really the foreign policy vision Democrats want to offer America? Giving our enemies guarantees while involving hostile nations in our security decisions?