Politics

WATCH: Code Pink Crashes NYC Climate Week Event, Turns It Into Anti-Military Rant

Gary FranchiSeptember 25, 2026299 views
Climate activism challenges the military's environmental impact at New York City panel.
Climate activism challenges the military's environmental impact at New York City panel. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

NEW YORK — A Climate Week event hosted by one of the nation's largest environmental nonprofits was interrupted this week when agitators from the far-left activist group Code Pink stormed the proceedings and turned it into a tirade against the U.S. military.

The disruption unfolded at a Nature Conservancy event held as part of NYC Climate Week, the annual confab that draws corporate executives, nonprofit leaders and climate activists to Manhattan every September. According to Fox News Politics, Code Pink demonstrators demanded that the Nature Conservancy address what they described as the Pentagon's carbon footprint and military pollution.

During the incident, one protester was captured on video ranting against the U.S. armed forces — a scene that quickly made the rounds on social media.

The Wrong Target

What makes the stunt notable is who the activists chose to confront. The Nature Conservancy is not a defense contractor. It is a land-preservation charity best known for buying up acreage for conservation and working with farmers, ranchers and local governments. It has no authority over Pentagon fuel consumption, weapons systems or military readiness — a point that appeared lost on the demonstrators.

Code Pink has a long history of confrontation-driven protests, dating back to its founding in 2002 as an anti-war outfit. In the two decades since, the group has shown up at congressional hearings, military recruitment offices and political events, typically with the goal of generating viral confrontation footage.

Neither the Nature Conservancy nor Code Pink responded to requests for comment on the incident as of publication. It is not known whether event organizers had security present or whether any arrests were made.

A Movement Eating Its Own

The clash also exposes a fracture inside the environmental movement itself. The same coalition that spent years telling Americans to trust the science and follow the experts now finds its own flagship institutions targeted by activists who say those institutions are not radical enough.

Climate Week in New York has become an annual showcase for that tension — a week of panels, parties and pledges where corporate sponsors mingle with direct-action groups, and where the question of who is truly committed to the cause is settled by who can shout loudest.

The Pentagon has not commented on the protest. The U.S. military is the single largest institutional consumer of energy in the federal government, a fact that has been the subject of congressional debate for years as both parties have pushed for alternative fuels and efficiency upgrades on different grounds.

Our Take

Let's be clear about what happened here. A group of professional protesters walked into a charity's panel, shouted down the room, and demanded that a land-conservation nonprofit account for the defense budget. That is not activism. That is performance art for people who have never held a job that requires a security clearance.

And notice the underlying message: the U.S. military — the institution that keeps the lights on at every one of these climate conferences — is now the villain of the environmental movement. These are the same people who spent the last several years telling you that a carbon tax is about saving the planet, not about hobbling American power. The mask is slipping.

The Nature Conservancy did not build a single warship. It did not fly a single sortie. It buys land so that it stays wild. If Code Pink actually cared about conservation, it would be celebrating that work, not screaming at it. But the goal was never conservation. The goal was the cameras.

There is a real debate to be had about military energy policy — and conservatives should have it, because fuel independence is a national security issue, not a climate one. But that debate will not happen at a Climate Week panel that gets hijacked by a group that has spent twenty years mistaking disruption for persuasion.

Here is the question worth asking: if the Left will turn on its own environmental allies this quickly, what do you think they have planned for the rest of us?

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

A
AmericanEagleVerifiedjust now
Military plays a crucial role in disaster response and national security. We need to acknowledge their contribution, not bash them at these events.
L
LibertyLoverVerifiedjust now
This is just another example of how some groups can't stay on topic. Climate events should focus on solutions, not unrelated agendas.
P
Patriot66Verifiedjust now
Exactly! It's so frustrating when they hijack discussions to push their own narrative.
S
StarSpangledManVerifiedjust now
So tired of these activists disrupting everything! If they want to make a point, they should host their own events instead of ruining others.
L
LibertyBelleVerifiedjust now
I couldn't agree more. It's disrespectful and counterproductive.
C
ConservativeMindVerifiedjust now
How can they claim to care about the climate while ignoring the military's history of disaster relief? It's a shame.
S
SouthernPrideVerifiedjust now
Served in the military for over a decade, and I can assure you our forces care deeply about protecting the planet too. Some people just fail to see the big picture.