Politics

EXPOSED: Dem Senate Nominee Who Told Kansas Megachurch to REPENT for Eating Beef Now Wants Your Vote

Gary FranchiSeptember 28, 2026217 views
Senate nominee challenges Kansas' agricultural practices, stirring controversy over beef consumption.
Senate nominee challenges Kansas' agricultural practices, stirring controversy over beef consumption. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

In Kansas, cows outnumber people. That is not a slogan; it is arithmetic. And it is the backdrop for a video clip that Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., is now making sure every voter in the Sunflower State sees before November.

Adam Hamilton — the Democratic nominee running to unseat Marshall — spent years leading the Church of the Resurrection, the largest United Methodist congregation in the United States, in the Kansas City suburbs. During a January 2020 sermon titled "What would Jesus say about climate change?", Hamilton called on his congregation to repent over their carbon footprints, a sermon Fox News Digital reviewed and first reported Monday.

"That's what repentance means — I saw things differently, it changed my heart, and it changed my behavior," Hamilton told the congregation in that sermon, per Fox News Digital.

The venue matters as much as the words. Kansas has sent a Republican to the Senate for 94 straight years. Marshall's campaign is betting that a candidate who preached repentance for beef consumption in a state where cattle ranching is both economy and identity is a gift that keeps giving through Election Day.

The Farm Bill, the Diesel, and the Fight Over Who Is Lecturing Whom

Marshall did not wait for the clip to go viral on its own. "In a state with more cattle than people, Hamilton saying that Kansans need repent for eating too much beef and flip flopping on the Farm Bill proves he'd be just like every other liberal Democrat in the Senate," Marshall told Fox News Digital in a statement.

Hamilton's campaign fired back hard, and their response is worth reading in full because it turns Marshall's own Senate record into the counterattack. "Marshall even bragged how the decline of the herd 'eliminated half of the methane gas produced from cattle already,'" Tyson Brody, a spokesperson for Hamilton, told Fox News Digital. "As Adam said at the debate, Roger should repent for failing to stand up for Kansas cattle producers on tariffs, foreign imports, and skyrocketing diesel prices, and now he should repent for attacking Adam for something Roger Marshall said himself in the Senate. Kansas producers don't need lectures from someone who voted to put warning labels on hot dogs and bacon."

That is the fight in a nutshell: each side accusing the other of talking down to the people who actually raise the herds. Whether voters buy the flip is another question entirely.

A Red State That Has Suddenly Gotten Interesting

The beef sermon is not landing in a vacuum. The Marshall-Hamilton race has tightened unexpectedly in recent months, with Fox News' Power Rankings moving Kansas from "Likely R" to "Lean R" and the Cook Political Report shifting its rating the same direction, according to Fox News Digital.

One driver, per Fox News Digital's reporting, is anxiety over high fuel prices — particularly diesel, which runs an agriculture-heavy state — tied to President Donald Trump's Iran war. That pressure is expanding the map of Senate battlegrounds Republicans now have to defend to hold their majority.

Hamilton is not a conventional Democratic candidate. A first-time office-seeker after a 36-year career in the pulpit, he won a ten-person Democratic primary in August and has pitched his campaign as an expression of his faith, telling a meet-and-greet crowd of about 40 people in Emporia in late August that he is not running to force anyone to be Christian or United Methodist, but to uphold the Constitution and fight for individual rights, according to Drop Site News.

Republicans have not returned the courtesy."

What This Means for November

The mechanics are simple. Hamilton's path to the Senate runs through suburban Kansas City moderates and enough rural voters to cut into a 94-year Republican streak. Every clip of a megachurch pastor telling cattle country to repent over hamburgers makes that path steeper.

Marshall's path depends on keeping national Democratic turnout low and tying Hamilton to the national party's least popular positions. A sermon about carbon footprints does that work for free.

The race will be decided by Kansans who know a diesel bill and a beef price when they see one — not by a 2020 sermon, unless one side lets it be. Marshall is clearly counting on that, and Hamilton's team is betting the senator's own votes on hot dog warning labels and foreign imports are the real repentance story here.

Neither man is backing down. Both are telling voters the other one is the one who needs to change his heart.

Our Take

Let's be blunt about what this story actually is.

A man who spent his career pastoring the largest United Methodist congregation in America once stood in a pulpit and told his flock that following Jesus meant repenting for their carbon footprint — in Kansas, where the cattle herd is a point of pride, not a sin to confess. Six years later, the same man wants a Senate seat, and his spokesperson's best defense is to point at Roger Marshall and say, "He did it too."

That is not a rebuttal. That is an admission that the sermon is a political problem, dressed up as a counterpunch.

Here is the tell: Hamilton's campaign insists he is not running to impose his theology on Kansans. Nobody asked him to. The issue is not that a pastor preached about creation care. The issue is a candidate who spent 36 years telling people how to live now asking those same people to send him to Washington to write rules for how they make a living. Kansas cattle families do not need a senator who once implied their dinner table needed forgiveness. They need one who will fight for their diesel, their tariffs, and their markets. Marshall has his own record to answer for on all three, and voters should hold him to it.

But Hamilton can stand for office if he wants. What he cannot do is spend two decades calling beef-eating a matter for repentance and then act surprised when cattle country remembers.

The question for Kansas is not whether Adam Hamilton was too woke for a pulpit. It is whether the same man gets to bring that pulpit to the Senate floor — and that answer belongs to the people who shovel the feed and pay the fuel bill. Folks, they will have it in November.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (8)

Leave a Comment

L
LibertyLassVerifiedjust now
If a candidate can't respect our traditions, how can they expect to represent us? This just shows how out of touch some politicians are.
C
ConcernedFarmerVerifiedjust now
As a farmer, this stands out as another slap in the face to those of us raising cattle. It's not just about politics, it's about understanding our community. Has she proposed any real solutions for our rural economy?
A
AgAdvocateVerifiedjust now
Good question! Just preaching without solutions isn't going to help our farms thrive.
C
CountryGal123Verifiedjust now
Telling Kansans to stop eating beef? That's not how you win votes around here. Not everyone wants to give up their BBQ!
B
BBQLover92Verifiedjust now
You're right! There's nothing like a good steak on the grill. It's like they don't understand our way of life.
H
HeartlandPatriotVerifiedjust now
This is outrageous! How can someone ask a church to repent for eating beef? It's part of our culture and livelihood here in Kansas.
M
MidwestGritVerifiedjust now
Exactly! Beef farming has been sustaining families here for generations. This is out of touch with what matters to the people in our state.
P
Patriot1776Verifiedjust now
Wow, just wow! I’ve heard it all now. This is as ridiculous as it gets!