Politics

FEDS HAVE DNA IN OMAR PROBE, REPORTS SAY AS STORY SPREADS ACROSS RIGHT-LEANING MEDIA

Gary FranchiOctober 20, 20260 views
Federal scrutiny of Ilhan Omar's immigration record dominates right-leaning coverage.
Federal scrutiny of Ilhan Omar's immigration record dominates right-leaning coverage. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

Federal investigators are in possession of DNA evidence and a personal passport as part of a criminal investigation into allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and possibly members of her family defrauded immigration authorities, according to reports attributed to Fox News and the New York Post. The claim was carried by Newsmax, RedState and the commentator Dom Lucre, who told his audience the material could prove Omar married her brother.

The reporting, as described by RedState's Nick Arama, holds that people familiar with the years-long probe say investigators have used whistleblowers and government records and have now obtained DNA in an effort to substantiate decade-old allegations against Omar and possibly her father. According to that account, sources who spoke to both the New York Post and Fox discussed the DNA evidence but pushed back on reports that it was obtained through "dumpster diving."

Fox News reporting attributed to correspondent David Spunt states that the feds have Omar's DNA and personal passport as part of the investigation into her United States citizenship. It is unclear how the DNA was obtained, but sources told Spunt it did not come from a trash can or dumpster, and Fox News was told that reports of agents dumpster diving are incorrect. The same reporting states the feds have her personal passport as evidence, that her official passport through her office has not been retrieved, and that authorities are not concerned she has fled the country. They believe she is in the United States and feel that flight would create problems for her down the line, as her husband and family members are in the country. The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice have declined to comment on the investigation, according to the Fox account.

Newsmax, an outlet with 3.7 million followers on X, summarized the development by saying DNA evidence could play a crucial role in the federal investigation and noted the evidence is part of a probe into allegations that Omar and possibly members of her family defrauded immigration authorities.

RedState, which has 370,000 followers on X, framed the development as "intriguing new info on the Ilhan Omar DNA and passport questions," pointing readers to its fuller write-up of how the evidence was described and what remains disputed about its collection.

Dom Lucre, a commentator posting to 1.7 million followers under the handle @dom_lucre, went considerably further than the reporting, telling his audience that the feds "just revealed they now have DNA evidence that could prove Ilhan Omar committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother." That assertion — that the evidence would prove a marriage between siblings — is Lucre's characterization and is not supported by the reporting cited by the other outlets, which describes an investigation into allegations of immigration fraud without confirming that specific claim.

The video Lucre attached to that post does not carry the announcement. Its transcript is a rap performance whose audible lines include "Backpikes from Magnet," "What's going through my mind?" and "Somebody turn the fake design on," with no reference to Omar, DNA or the investigation. Whatever the clip was intended to convey, the spoken content does not corroborate the text posted above it.

Other outlets moved the story quickly through the evening and overnight hours. The Gateway Pundit, in a piece by Cristina Laila, reported that federal investigators have DNA evidence in their criminal investigation into Omar's immigration fraud. WLT Report told readers that sources say investigators have obtained DNA evidence while the congresswoman continues to deny wrongdoing. Another aggregation stated that federal prosecutors are planning to use DNA evidence to prove Omar committed immigration fraud as part of what it called a sprawling investigation. A separate report looked back at the origins of the probe, noting that Scott Johnson, a retired Minnesota attorney and co-founder of Powerline Blog, first began looking into Omar in 2016.

The reaction spread along a recognizable path: a commentator's categorical claim drew attention first, outlets with large followings packaged the DNA and passport details, and aggregators carried the story onward under headlines asserting the evidence would prove fraud. In each iteration the underlying material traced back to the same sourcing — people described as familiar with the investigation speaking to Fox News and the New York Post — rather than to any document, charging decision or statement on the record from prosecutors.

Omar has denied wrongdoing in connection with the allegations over her immigration history. Next News Network could not independently verify the claim that federal investigators possess DNA evidence in the probe, or the further claim that such evidence would prove immigration fraud or a marriage between siblings.

Our Take

The conservative press is doing what it has done for years with the Omar file: reporting a development, then letting the loudest voice in the room convert an allegation into a verdict. There is a real investigation here, and the DNA and passport details, if accurate, are a genuine escalation that deserves scrutiny. But there is a wide gap between investigators possessing evidence in a fraud probe and a commentator telling 1.7 million people that the evidence "could prove" a marriage between siblings, and that gap is where credibility gets spent. Note too how the story traveled — not from a charging document or a prosecutor's announcement, but from unnamed sources to aggregators to headlines that read as though the case were closed. If the feds intend to prove something, they will have to do it in court, with documents and testimony the public can examine. Until then, the responsible posture is to report the probe aggressively, keep the sourcing visible, and refuse to let a rap video and a capitalized "BREAKING" do the work that evidence is supposed to do.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Be the first to comment on this article.