Politics

ICE CRACKDOWN DIVIDES WISCONSIN: Tiffany Vows to FORCE Sheriff Cooperation as Crowley Pushes to Restrict Federal Agents

Gary FranchiOctober 22, 202659 views
Wisconsin counties weigh cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
Wisconsin counties weigh cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

Republican Wisconsin gubernatorial nominee Tom Tiffany vowed Wednesday to require local sheriffs to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, setting up a sharp contrast with Democrat David Crowley over President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda during their general election debate hosted by WISN-TV.

"I will make sure that local, county and state law enforcement coordinate with federal law enforcement," Tiffany said, according to reporting from Jammin 99.9 (WKXB FM). Tiffany argued that honoring ICE detainers allows authorities to remove illegal immigrants accused of crimes while they are still in county custody, rather than releasing them back onto the streets.

Crowley, the Milwaukee County executive, said he would not support a blanket ban on cooperation with federal immigration authorities and agreed that immigrants convicted of crimes should be deported. But he outlined a series of restrictions he would pursue, including barring contracts between local law enforcement and ICE, requiring judicial warrants before agents can enter jails and prisons, and prohibiting federal agents from wearing masks during operations.

"We need to make sure that we're protecting people's civil liberties," Crowley said during the debate.

The exchange reflects a growing flashpoint in Wisconsin, where ICE arrests surged this summer as the Trump administration expanded its nationwide deportation push. Twenty county law enforcement agencies in the state already participate in ICE's 287(g) program, which allows designated local officers to perform certain immigration enforcement functions, according to the outlet.

Cooperation with ICE has also emerged as an issue in sheriff races in Sauk and Winnebago counties ahead of the November election, signaling that the debate extends well beyond the governor's mansion.

Tiffany's pledge to mandate compliance with ICE detainers would represent a significant shift in state policy, potentially requiring sheriff's departments that have resisted cooperation to fall in line or face consequences. The specifics of how such a mandate would be enforced were not detailed during the debate.

Crowley's proposals, meanwhile, would place new hurdles in front of federal agents operating in Wisconsin jails and prisons. Requiring judicial warrants for ICE agents to enter detention facilities and prohibiting masks would alter current practices in Milwaukee County and potentially statewide if he were to win the governorship and implement them through executive action or legislation.

The debate comes as the Trump administration's immigration crackdown has increasingly collided with state and local governments across the country, putting sheriffs and police departments at the center of a national fight over how far local authorities should go to assist federal agents carrying out the president's deportation agenda.

Wisconsin has seen a sharp increase in federal immigration enforcement since Trump returned to office, and the issue is now front and center in the race to lead the swing state.

Our Take

Here's the choice Wisconsin voters face in November, plain as day. Tom Tiffany wants law enforcement to work together — local, county, state, and federal — so that criminal illegal aliens don't get dumped back into Wisconsin neighborhoods because a sheriff refused to pick up the phone. David Crowley wants to put handcuffs on ICE agents, demand warrants before they can enter a jail, and ban them from wearing masks while they do a dangerous job.

Crowley says he's protecting civil liberties. But whose liberties? The illegal alien accused of a crime who gets released back onto the street, or the Wisconsin family that has to live next door to him? Every detainer that goes unhonored is a chance for a criminal to disappear before justice can be served. Tiffany understands that cooperation isn't optional — it's a public safety imperative.

The 287(g) program already works in twenty Wisconsin counties. Sheriffs there have seen the benefit of coordinated enforcement. Tiffany's plan would extend that cooperation statewide, ensuring that no county becomes a sanctuary for those who break our laws. Crowley's plan would do the opposite, erecting bureaucratic barricades between local jails and federal agents.

Patriots, this is what the fight looks like up close. The Trump administration is doing its part, but the success of the deportation agenda depends on local cooperation. Wisconsin voters have a clear choice: a governor who will stand with ICE and law enforcement, or one who will stand in their way. The answer will shape the safety of communities across the Badger State for years to come.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

D
DairylandDad76Verifiedjust now
I work construction in Dane County and half our crew is legal, the other half nobody asks questions. I'm not heartless, but when my cousin waited 12 years to come here the right way, it burns me up that others skip the line and get protected by local officials. Something's gotta give.
P
PackerBackerWIVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain what 'restrict federal agents' even means in practice? Like, is Crowley going to physically block ICE from county facilities? Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
C
ConstitutionFirstGalVerifiedjust now
Love it! Tiffany 2026!
S
SaukCountySamVerifiedjust now
She's got my vote locked up already. Tough on the issues that actually matter.
B
BadgerStatePatriotVerifiedjust now
Finally someone with a backbone. Tiffany gets it - if a sheriff won't cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, they shouldn't get a dime of state or federal funding. Simple as that.
N
NorthwoodsMikeVerifiedjust now
Exactly. We're not asking them to round people up themselves, just to pick up the phone. This is common sense.
K
KenoshaStrongVerifiedjust now
Crowley's sanctuary push is going to backfire big time with voters next election. Mark my words.