Videos

EXPOSED: Alaska Democrats Planted Second 'Dan Sullivan' on Ballot to Steal Senate Seat—Vance Calls It What It Is

Gary FranchiOctober 28, 20260 views
EXPOSED: Alaska Democrats Planted Second 'Dan Sullivan' on Ballot to Steal Senate Seat—Vance Calls It What It Is
Advertisement

Alaska Democrats have been caught running a decoy candidate named Dan J. Sullivan on the U.S. Senate ballot, a move the state's own election director found was designed for no purpose other than to siphon votes from Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan. A state court put the impostor right back on the ballot anyway, and now Vice President JD Vance is naming the scheme for exactly what it is: electoral fraud.

The scam doesn't require a hacked voting machine or a rigged tabulator. It runs on confusion. It runs on working parents rushing through a ballot after a long shift, glancing at two names that read nearly identically. One is the Republican incumbent, Senator Dan S. Sullivan. The other is Dan J. Sullivan, a Democrat plant filed specifically to mislead voters who don't have time to scrutinize a middle initial.

Election Director Said It Existed to Steal Votes—Then a Court Stepped In

Alaska's Division of Elections examined the filing and concluded that Dan J. Sullivan existed only to steal votes from Senator Dan Sullivan. The agency removed him from the ballot on exactly that finding. But a state court overruled the election director's determination and ordered the decoy back onto the ballot, essentially handing Democrats the confusion they paid for.

Vice President Vance didn't mince words when asked about the scheme:

"When you put a person on the ballot explicitly to try to confuse voters, I think that's the definition of electoral fraud."

He then posed the test the legacy press refuses to answer. If Republicans had fielded a Mary Peltola in Alaska to split the Democrat vote, every network in America would be running wall-to-wall accusations of election fraud by sunrise. But because the fake name belongs to a Democrat, the story gets buried. That's not an oversight. That's complicity.

This Is the Left's Replacement for Ballot Harvesting in a Must-Hold Seat

The Trump Justice Department has now moved, because the Alaska Democratic Party filed a second Dan Sullivan to siphon conservative votes in a Senate race Republicans must hold. The left wants Americans to believe this is ordinary candidate filing. It is not. It is electoral fraud wearing a middle initial.

This is what the steal looks like in 2026. No broken windows. No ballot drops in the dead of night. Just a name on a screen that looks close enough to the real thing to fool a voter who's been up since five in the morning, worked nine hours, fed the kids, and is trying to do their civic duty before bed. Democrats are banking on exhaustion to win a Senate seat.

Alaska's election director already laid out the truth in the official finding. The decoy existed solely to deceive. The only question now is whether enough Americans are paying attention to stop it.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

M
MidwestPatriot88Verifiedjust now
I've worked as a poll volunteer for over a decade, and I've seen how easily voters get confused by similar names. If this was intentional, it's one of the oldest tricks in the book.
B
BayouConservativeVerifiedjust now
Sadly it works more often than people realize.
L
LibertyLassVerifiedjust now
Finally someone in leadership saying it out loud instead of dancing around it. This is why we need more people like Vance in Washington.
C
ConstitutionalCarolVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain the actual legal mechanism here? If the names are identical, how are voters supposed to know which 'Dan Sullivan' they're selecting?
R
RedStateRangerVerifiedjust now
This is huge. Share it with everyone you know before the algorithms bury it.
P
PatriotSam74Verifiedjust now
This is exactly the kind of trickery we've been warning about for years. When you can't win on ideas, you cheat the ballot. Vance is right to call it out loudly.
L
LibertyBellGalVerifiedjust now
Amen to that. Nothing surprises me anymore.
M
MooseCountryMikeVerifiedjust now
I lived in Alaska for 22 years and the ballot games up there have always been shady. Two candidates with the same name on one ballot is a recipe for confusion, plain and simple.
T
TundraTruthVerifiedjust now
Calling it a 'coincidence' is an insult to everyone's intelligence. You don't accidentally put a second identical name on a Senate ballot.
F
FrontierFranVerifiedjust now
They only care when it's their side being accused.
G
GreatLakesGOPVerifiedjust now
Exactly — and notice how quiet the mainstream outlets are about it.