Videos

EXPOSED: CNN BOOKS SWING LEFT ACTIVIST TO PRE-WRITE 'BLUE TSUNAMI' — PANEL'S 54-SEAT MAP COLLAPSES TO 49 ON THEIR OWN MATH

Gary FranchiNovember 3, 2026 ET8 views
Media coverage and polling forecasts of Senate races under scrutiny.
Media coverage and polling forecasts of Senate races under scrutiny. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

CNN's election eve coverage collapsed into self-parody Monday night when the network booked a Swing Left activist who declared the midterm results before a single vote had been counted. "I think it's going to be a tsunami," the panelist announced, reading from the same pre-approved script that Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, tried to force into reality on October 30th when he declared the blue wave was already done and dusted.

The anchor killed the fantasy in ten seconds flat.

On election eve, one of Bash's own analysts admitted the con out loud: "Let's remember that Hillary Clinton was going to be president in 2016, right?"

Right. Yet CNN still pumped a map that handed Democrats 54 Senate seats, as though the midterm environment was already locked and the only question was how big the liberal party would be. Then their own anchor ran the number that destroys the entire fantasy: Republicans are overperforming by 4.1 points in close Trump-state races. Run that math back through CNN's own map and their 54-seat landslide collapses to 49. Alaska, Texas, Kansas, Ohio — all of them flip red. The manufactured wave crumbles under the weight of the network's own data.

And after the walk-back, the same panel guest sneered at President Donald J. Trump's 2 a.m. repair of the Reflecting Pool as "gilded arts and crafts." Democrats let that 1922 Washington landmark rot for years under their watch. Now that a Republican fixed it, the repair itself is the scandal. That was the entire argument the left brought to Election Eve: a pre-written tsunami, a mocked infrastructure repair, and a panel of elite media insiders who never once questioned their own assumptions.

This is the whole case against the mainstream media's election coverage. They are not reporting the race. They are attempting to suppress turnout on one side while demoralizing the other into staying home. The word "tsunami" was not a prediction. It was a permission slip — permission for Democrats to treat the election as already won and for Republicans to wonder why they should bother showing up at all.

Tomorrow, that same panel will stand in front of the same map and explain away whatever number comes in with the same smug faces that promised you a wave tonight. But Patriots already saw the manufacture happen live. A pre-written tsunami that shrank to "cautiously optimistic" the second a host said no is not journalism. It is a propaganda operation running on autopilot.

The actual assignment for every conservative voter is simple: show up, bring somebody else, and refuse to let the pre-written tsunami stand. When the count finishes, the same network, same polls, same panel, same wrong will owe an answer. Share the clip of that exchange before the polls close. Your neighbors deserve to see the con before it counts.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

G
GreatLakesConservativeVerifiedNov 4, 5:41 PM ET
I work in media production and this kind of pre-writing happens more than people realize. The graphics packages, the chyrons, the 'projected winner' templates — they're often built days in advance. Doesn't mean it's rigged, but it does show they go in expecting a certain outcome.
B
BuckeyeMom4VerifiedNov 4, 8:41 PM ET
Can someone explain what 'their own math' means here? Are they saying the panel's own seat count dropped from 54 to 49 just by correcting their assumptions?
L
LibertyRider1776VerifiedNov 4, 9:41 PM ET
Exactly — they had to walk back their own projection because the numbers didn't hold up. Embarrassing.
G
GreatLakesConservativeVerifiedNov 5, 6:41 AM ET
Basically yes. When your model has to be revised down five seats before election night even happens, that tells you the model was built on wishful thinking.
L
LibertyRider1776VerifiedNov 4, 10:41 PM ET
This is exactly why I cancelled my CNN subscription years ago. They don't report the news anymore, they manufacture the narrative they want to see.
P
PatriotSueVerifiedNov 5, 2:41 AM ET
Same here. Best decision I ever made was cutting the cord on all of them.
D
DustyTrails66VerifiedNov 5, 5:41 AM ET
My wife and I used to watch the Sunday panels every week with our coffee. Somewhere along the way it stopped being analysis and turned into a pep rally. We switched to reading the polls ourselves. 😂