Politics

EXCLUSIVE: Former Jordan Aide Says GOP Needs a 'Wartime Consigliere' — and He's Backing Jim Jordan Over Scalise

Gary FranchiNovember 8, 2026 ET100 views
House GOP leadership fight sharpens as Trump oversight battle looms.
House GOP leadership fight sharpens as Trump oversight battle looms. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

Republicans need a wartime consigliere, not a committee chairman, to lead them through the two years of investigations Democrats are preparing against President Donald Trump — and the man for the job is Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), according to a former top aide to the Ohio congressman.

Russell Dye, a Republican strategist at Watchtower Strategy who spent nearly a decade as communications director for Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee, made the case Saturday on Breitbart News Saturday with host Matthew Boyle. Dye said the party should give its top House post to Jordan rather than current House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), who launched a competing bid the same day.

"If you ask Democrats and Republicans in D.C. who the best congressional investigator is … it is Jim Jordan," Dye told Boyle, according to Breitbart's account of the interview.

WHY THE FIGHT IS HAPPENING NOW

The leadership contest is unfolding after Republicans lost the House on Tuesday in what CBS News projected as a Democrat sweep that also flipped the Senate. With Democrats holding the gavels, Dye argued that the next two years will be defined by investigation after investigation targeting Trump, his family, and anyone who has worked with the president.

Scalise, the chamber's current majority leader, warned colleagues that "socialists are coming to Washington with a radical agenda" and pledged to win back the majority, per Breitbart's reporting.

Dye said Democrats would rather face Scalise, who he said has never handled a serious congressional investigation, and called for "new blood" atop the conference.

Jordan himself saw the midterm outcome coming. He told Breitbart News Daily in April that the elections came down to two sentences — "They're crazy. We're not" — and predicted Democrats would use a majority to tie up the president for two years.

A REMATCH OF 2023

The race is a rematch of the 2023 leadership fight that spilled into the open after Republicans removed then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Scalise won the conference's nomination that time but withdrew before a floor vote, and Jordan fell short of the votes needed to win outright on the floor.

That history matters for anyone counting votes. Scalise has run the floor operation and retains relationships across the conference; Jordan has the grassroots energy and the committee record — as Judiciary Chair, he has spent years questioning federal agencies, the FBI and the Justice Department — but has already shown he could not close a floor vote three years ago.

Breitbart News Saturday airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Eastern.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE CONFERENCE

The immediate question is whether House Republicans want a leader who can count votes and manage a minority, or an investigator-in-chief whose job is to counterprogram every Democrat hearing. For voters who backed Trump, the distinction is not academic: the minority leader sets the pace of the party's response when subpoenas start flying.

It is not yet known when the conference will vote on its leadership, and no public whip count has been released.

Our Take

Dye is right about one thing: the moment Democrats pick up the gavels, the House GOP stops being a legislative body and becomes a defense operation. Every subpoena aimed at Trump, his family and his former staff will be a television event, and the man setting the Republican counterpunch needs to know how the other side builds a case before they do.

Jordan has spent years in that arena. He was the tip of the spear in the Judiciary Committee's fights with the FBI, the DOJ and the administrative state — the same agencies Democrats will now use to weaponize oversight. Making him leader would tell every American who voted for Trump that the party is not going to lie down and take it.

Scalise is a capable man, but his resume is built on floor strategy, not confrontation. When the other side is running a war, you don't hand the command to the guy who runs the peacetime logistics. You hand it to the fighter your opponents fear.

Republicans lost on Tuesday. The question now is whether they learned anything from it — or whether they'll quietly hand the wheel to the same establishment that brought them a 2023 floor fight, a speaker's gavel in the trash, and a majority in the rearview mirror. If they want to fight back, the choice is obvious.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

L
LibertySteve74VerifiedNov 9, 8:34 AM ET
Finally someone saying what a lot of us have been thinking. Jordan has the fight in him that we need right now — this isn't business as usual anymore.
C
ConstitutionalPatriotVerifiedNov 9, 2:34 PM ET
Exactly. We're in a political war whether the establishment likes it or not.
R
ReaganRebornVerifiedNov 9, 1:34 PM ET
Serious question — what does a 'wartime consigliere' actually do in a legislative role? Is this about the Speaker fight or something else entirely? Genuinely curious what the aide meant by that framing.
M
MAGA_Mike_1776VerifiedNov 10, 3:34 AM ET
Wartime consigliere is exactly right. We need a fighter, not another suit who's worried about keeping his committee seat.
T
TexasTumbleweedVerifiedNov 10, 6:34 AM ET
Scalise's a good man too though. Let's not eat our own.
M
MAGA_Mike_1776VerifiedNov 10, 6:34 AM ET
I'm not knocking Scalise, I just think Jordan's the one who'll actually throw a punch for us.
G
GulfCoastGrandmaVerifiedNov 10, 9:34 AM ET
I remember watching Jordan go toe to toe with the committee chairs during the impeachment hearings and thinking, that's the guy. My husband said the same thing before he passed. Good to see people finally catching on.