Politics

BREAKING: Trump Backs Sheriff Who REFUSED to Let FBI Handle Key Evidence in Major Case

Gary FranchiFebruary 14, 2026270 views
BREAKING: Trump Backs Sheriff Who REFUSED to Let FBI Handle Key Evidence in Major Case
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

A brewing showdown between local law enforcement and the FBI has caught President Trump's attention, as Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos continues to refuse federal agents' demands to process key physical evidence in the high-profile Nancy Guthrie case.

Rather than bow to FBI pressure and send crucial evidence to their Quantico facility, Sheriff Nanos made the bold decision to ship it to an independent lab in Florida instead. The move has reportedly created "major friction" between his office and federal agents who expected automatic compliance with their requests.

President Trump, who has consistently criticized FBI overreach and corruption, threw his support behind the sheriff's decision during remarks to reporters. "Sheriff Nanos is doing exactly what more law enforcement should do - putting the integrity of the investigation above the FBI's demands for control," Trump stated.

Deep State Power Grab?

This standoff highlights a growing tension between local authorities and federal agencies that many Americans have grown to distrust. Why is the FBI so insistent on controlling this evidence? What are they afraid an independent lab might find that their own facilities wouldn't?

Sheriff Nanos, while disputing reports of "major friction," hasn't backed down from his decision to seek analysis outside the FBI's sphere of influence. His choice to use a Florida lab represents exactly the kind of independent thinking that drives the Deep State crazy.

"We're seeing more local officials stand up to federal overreach, and that's exactly what the Founders intended," said one constitutional law expert.

The FBI's aggressive push to control evidence processing raises serious questions about their motives. After years of corruption scandals, botched investigations, and political weaponization, is it any wonder that local sheriffs are looking elsewhere for objective analysis?

President Trump's backing of Sheriff Nanos sends a clear message: this administration won't automatically side with federal agencies against local law enforcement who are trying to do their jobs properly.

Will more sheriffs follow Nanos's example and start refusing FBI demands? Patriots across America are watching to see if this marks the beginning of real pushback against federal overreach.

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (6)

Leave a Comment

A
AmericaFirst1776Verifiedjust now
About time we have a president who supports our local heroes instead of the deep state!
P
PatriotMike47Verifiedjust now
Finally someone with backbone! Local sheriffs know their communities better than federal bureaucrats sitting in DC. Sheriff departments are accountable to the people who elected them.
C
ConstitutionalConservativeVerifiedjust now
Exactly! The 10th Amendment exists for a reason - states rights matter!
S
SmallTownSheriffVerifiedjust now
As a retired deputy, I've seen firsthand how the feds come in and take over cases that should stay local. Sometimes we know the situation better than agents who fly in from 500 miles away. This sheriff made the right call.
T
ThinBlueLineVerifiedjust now
Thank you for your service! Local law enforcement definitely gets overlooked too often.
B
BackTheBlue2024Verifiedjust now
Good for Trump backing this sheriff. Does anyone know what specific case this is referring to? I'd like to read more details about what evidence we're talking about here.