The swamp creatures are at it again, Patriots. In a move that has Republican lawmakers seeing red, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has quietly appointed Jennifer Daskal—yes, the same woman who helped craft the Biden regime's Orwellian "disinformation" board—as an advisor on government surveillance matters.
This is the same FISA court system that rubber-stamped the bogus surveillance warrants used to spy on President Trump's 2016 campaign. Now they're bringing in a lawyer who spent years trying to silence conservative voices under the guise of fighting "misinformation."
Republican members of Congress are rightfully furious about this appointment, recognizing it for what it truly is: another attempt by the administrative state to embed their operatives in positions where they can continue their war against American patriots.
The Deep State's Greatest Hits
Let's remember who Jennifer Daskal really is. This isn't some neutral legal scholar—she's a partisan operative who worked tirelessly to create government mechanisms to censor free speech. Her involvement in the Biden administration's disinformation board was a direct assault on the First Amendment rights of every American.
"The FISA court has a history of approving surveillance requests at an alarming rate, and now they're bringing in advisors who have proven they can't be trusted with Americans' constitutional rights," one Republican lawmaker told reporters.
The timing couldn't be more suspicious. Just as President Trump's second administration is working to drain the swamp and restore constitutional governance, the deep state is doubling down on placing their allies in key positions throughout the surveillance apparatus.
Patriots Must Stay Vigilant
This appointment represents everything wrong with the unelected bureaucracy that has been weaponized against the American people. While President Trump works to dismantle the administrative state, these shadow operators continue their efforts to maintain control over the levers of power.
The question every freedom-loving American should be asking is simple: Why would a court tasked with protecting national security choose an advisor whose track record shows a clear hostility toward the constitutional rights of American citizens? The answer reveals the true nature of the swamp we're still fighting to drain.