A Trump attorney who endured years of Democrat lawfare persecution is finally fighting back, demanding that a liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice recuse herself after she publicly smeared him as a racist.
Jim Troupis, who represented President Trump during the 2020 election challenges, filed a motion asking Justice Jill Karofsky to step aside from his case. Karofsky had the audacity to publicly label Troupis as promoting "racism" simply for doing his job - representing the rightfully elected President of the United States.
This is exactly the kind of judicial activism and bias that Patriots have come to expect from liberal-controlled courts. When these activist judges can't win on the merits, they resort to character assassination and personal attacks.
The Lawfare Machine Exposed
Troupis has been dragged through the Democrats' endless lawfare campaign for the crime of standing up for election integrity. Now he's demanding basic due process - something that should be guaranteed to every American, but apparently doesn't apply if you dare to support Trump.
"No litigant should have to appear before a judge who has already publicly condemned them," Troupis argued in his filing. It's a principle so basic that even first-year law students understand it, but liberal activists on the bench seem to think the rules don't apply to them.
"This is what weaponized justice looks like - when judges become partisan attack dogs instead of impartial arbiters of the law."
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority has shown time and again that they're more interested in advancing the Democrat agenda than upholding constitutional principles. Justice Karofsky's inflammatory comments prove she has no business sitting in judgment of Troupis.
Fighting Back Against Judicial Tyranny
This recusal demand represents more than just one lawyer's fight for fairness - it's a stand against the entire corrupt system that has weaponized our courts against conservatives and Trump supporters.
How many more Patriots will be forced to demand basic fairness from judges who have already made up their minds? When will Americans say enough is enough to this judicial tyranny?