Politics

OUTRAGE: Yale Professor's Shocking ‘Demonic’ Voting Idea for Kids Sparks Backlash

Gary FranchiAugust 17, 2026186 views
OUTRAGE: Yale Professor's Shocking ‘Demonic’ Voting Idea for Kids Sparks Backlash
Photo by Generated on Unsplash

In a storm of controversy that has captured the attention of the nation, Yale law and history professor Samuel Moyn's radical voting proposal for children has conservative circles howling in disbelief. On the latest installment of his “Interesting Times” podcast, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat hosted Moyn, who brazenly suggested giving minors a stake in elections, prompting fierce rebuke from conservative voices.

The clip, which has since gone viral, reveals Moyn arguing that since decisions made today tremendously affect future generations, the possibility exists for an alternative class of voters to cast ballots on behalf of minors. He dismissed current legal prohibitions, sparking indignation from many across the political spectrum who viewed this as an attack on democratic principles.

Josh Howerton, a prominent conservative leader, immediately took to social media to express his dismay at Moyn’s outrageous idea. Retweeting 'tjJohns89032609,' who had shared the original article, Howerton wrote, "This is the kind of lunacy we expect from the ivory towers. Americans must not stand for this blatant disrespect for our electoral integrity!"

@tjJohns89032609 highlighted the broader reactions, sharing with followers, "Josh Howerton reacts to Ross Douthat’s VIRAL interview with Yale professor over ‘demonic’ voting idea for kids," amplifying the wave of criticism that followed the podcast’s release.

This proposal doesn’t just undermine the sanctity of individual voting rights but seems to flirt dangerously close to authoritarianism by allowing a select class to control democratic outcomes. Such an approach flies in the face of America's core values, where individual liberty and responsibility are paramount.

Pundits across the pro-America media landscape were quick to denounce Moyn's suggestions, labeling it a slippery slope toward eroding the voting rights of eligible citizens. For folks who cherish democracy and understand the importance of safeguarding its process, this proposal is not just offensive, but downright perilous.

In these “interesting times,” as they call it, Americans must stay vigilant against such attempts to dilute their votes and their voices. Patriots, are you prepared to protect your electoral rights, or will you allow radical ideas to reshape the foundation of our republic?

G
Gary Franchi

Award-winning journalist covering breaking news, politics & culture for Next News Network.

Share this article:

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

I
IllinoisRangerVerifiedjust now
I remember when voting was a right and a responsibility for those capable of understanding its implications. Teaching children the importance of voting is great, but giving them the vote? Absolutely not.
F
FreedomFanVerifiedjust now
Absolutely agree with you. Let's focus on education first.
T
TexanTruthVerifiedjust now
The manipulation of our voting system needs to end, not be expanded under ridiculous pretenses.
B
BaldEagleVerifiedjust now
Agreed! This isn't a game. Our democracy depends on informed voters.
O
OldSchoolValuesVerifiedjust now
This is just another step in undermining traditional values. What's next, letting pets vote?
R
RedWave99Verifiedjust now
This is laughable. The left is getting desperate and it shows!
A
AmericanMomVerifiedjust now
As a mother, I can't imagine letting my kids vote. They barely understand what they want for dinner!
R
RuralHeartVerifiedjust now
My grandfather always said, 'Don't put the cart before the horse.' Let's educate kids first, not push them into decisions they can't understand.
C
ConservativePatriotVerifiedjust now
It's absolutely insane to suggest children should be voting. They don't have the life experience or maturity to make those kinds of decisions!
L
LibertyRocksVerifiedjust now
Exactly! This is nothing short of a desperate attempt to manipulate future elections.
S
StarSpangledVerifiedjust now
Can someone explain how this could even be constitutional? Children are not equipped to handle such responsibilities.