Politics

SOCIALISTS WHO CAN'T DEFINE SOCIALISM: Maryland liberals melt down when asked who owns what

Gary FranchiOctober 10, 2026191 views
Uncertain boundaries of personal property and socialist definitions in Maryland communities.
Uncertain boundaries of personal property and socialist definitions in Maryland communities. | Next News Editorial Illustration
Advertisement

Patriots, here's your weekend laugh — and your weekend warning.

A Gallup poll shows 43% of Americans now say they view socialism positively. But when Fox News Digital took cameras to the annual Takoma Park street festival in deep-blue Maryland — one of the most reliably left-wing zip codes in America — it found something the polling data can't tell you: the people wearing the label can't agree on what it means.

"The fact is that there's no… one answer," documentary filmmaker and self-described historian Nina Gilden Seavey told Fox News Digital when asked to define socialism.

Jenny Sniderman, another festivalgoer, gave a more direct answer — but not the one Karl Marx would have given. She said "public libraries, the police department, the fire department, all our public services, utilities" make up socialism. That's not socialism. That's municipal services — and if that's the standard, every small-town American is a communist.

THE PROPERTY QUESTION

Here's where the friendly festival mood curdled. Fox News Digital pressed the same attendees on whether they would personally surrender private property to government or collective control — the actual core of the socialist economic program. Their answer: heavy skepticism.

Seavey questioned the idea of government control over private assets, then tried to separate the growing movement from the thing it's named after. "This is not socialism. This is democratic socialism. It's different," she said. "There's socialism, there's communism, there are all kinds of 'isms.' Democratic socialism is essentially what we have a growing movement in this country."

The problem with that answer, as the Fox News Digital report noted, is that the Democratic Socialists of America — the largest socialist organization in the country — is not vague at all. The DSA advocates redistributing wealth from wealthy individuals and corporations to workers and lower-income Americans. It calls for a public stake in major corporations and essential industries rather than private ownership.

That's the DSA's own platform, not a right-wing caricature. When the cameras weren't rolling, nobody was willing to volunteer their house, their car, or their savings for the collective.

A separate Reuters/Ipsos survey from 2018 found that when Americans were asked to define socialism in their own words, only 17% described it as government ownership or control of businesses or the means of production. Another 23% associated it with equality. Ten% pointed to social benefits and services. Nearly a quarter couldn't answer at all. That's a word doing an enormous amount of work for a movement that refuses to define it.

VANCE ENTERS THE FRAY

The definitional fog isn't confined to the DSA-adjacent crowd. Vice President JD Vance was asked earlier this week to define socialism at a press conference, and his answer wandered from prioritizing workers to immigration to transgender athletes in girls' sports.

"Oh man… It's honestly a hard term to define these days," Vance said, according to C-SPAN footage cited by PinkNews. "Classically, you would think socialism is about prioritising workers… I think in reality what it actually means in the American context is, that you want to replace American workers with foreign workers, and you want boys to play in girls' sports."

An independent columnist at the Substack written by a former journalist argued that Vance couldn't give the textbook definition — government or workers controlling the means of production — because the Trump administration's own industrial policy has involved government stakes in companies like Intel, U.S. Steel, and MP Materials. That's a partisan argument, and the administration would describe those moves as national-security investments, not socialism. But it's worth noting that both sides of the aisle are now slinging the word without agreeing on what it means.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOU

When 43% of your fellow Americans tell a pollster they like an economic system, but can't define it, and won't accept its most basic premise when you ask them in person, you're not looking at a political movement. You're looking at a vibe. That vibe has real consequences: candidates who win primaries on it, budgets that get passed in its name, and agencies that grow because nobody asked the question Fox News Digital asked on a sunny festival afternoon — who owns what, and who decides?

Our Take

Here's the bottom line, folks. Socialism sells in America for exactly one reason: nobody ever makes you sign the paperwork.

It's easy to cheer for "free" healthcare, "free" college, and "free" everything when the price tag is hidden and the word is undefined. But the moment a reporter asks these true believers the one question that matters — would you hand your property, your paycheck, and your business over to the government? — the movement suddenly discovers the Tenth Amendment.

Even the Vice President, a Yale Law graduate, couldn't give the textbook definition when the microphone was in his face. That's not a gotcha. That's a symptom. When the word means everything to everyone, it means the people using it haven't thought it through — or they have, and they know you won't like the answer.

The DSA is honest about what it wants. The festivalgoers in Takoma Park are not. And 43% of Americans are telling pollsters they like a thing they can't describe. That gap is where the next election gets decided.

So ask your neighbors. Ask your kids' teachers. Ask the candidates knocking on your door. Ask them to define it — and then ask them what they're willing to give up.

Watch the running. You'll learn more from that than from any poll number ever printed.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Gary Franchi
Gary Franchi

Chief White House Correspondent at Next News Network. Executive Producer and Lead Anchor.

Share this article:

Comments (4)

Leave a Comment

T
TruePatriotVerifiedjust now
Shared this with my whole family. Important stuff.
J
JohnnyPatriotVerifiedjust now
The mainstream media won't cover this. Thank you NNN!
R
RedWhiteBlueVerifiedjust now
Great article! This is exactly what we need to hear.
W
WeThePeopleVerifiedjust now
Finally, someone telling the truth!