In a stunning admission, even CNN was forced to acknowledge that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg failed to prove former President Donald Trump’s guilt in the Stormy Daniels hush money case. Defense attorney Randy Zelin exposed the glaring holes in Bragg’s weak attempt to criminalize Trump’s actions, citing numerous instances of reasonable doubt that plague the prosecution’s case. Donald Trump Jr. echoed these sentiments, arguing that the prosecution’s reliance on Michael Cohen, a witness known for his deception, is the very definition of reasonable doubt. Zelin questioned the credibility of star witnesses Cohen and Stormy Daniels, highlighting their personal agendas and lack of reliability. Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, admitted to stealing from his boss and has profited millions from his testimony, while Daniels’ irrelevant and prejudicial statements have led to a mistrial motion from Trump’s defense team. With two lawyers on the jury, some experts worry that their analytical nature and technical expertise could lead to an acquittal. As the trial unfolds, it becomes increasingly clear that Bragg’s case is politically motivated and lacks the substance needed to prove Trump’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Tune in to this special report as we delve into the intricacies of the case and explore why Bragg’s prosecution is crumbling under scrutiny.
