The New York Times, with its latest and low-reach scandal attempt, is stirring the pot once again. The controversy? Years ago, a Supreme Court Justice’s wife apparently reversed a flag. Talk about desperation. The media moguls are clearly scrambling to engineer a reason for the Supreme Court’s ‘reform’. Adding new seats and pushing leftist idealists into them feels like the clear agenda here. But nobody’s falling for it. Why? Because we’re wise to the media’s Supreme Court games.
The moment Trump put his nominees out there, the media questioned court legitimacy and suggested a change was needed. Fast forward to a year later, you see how they’ve tried to push their narrative. It’s like a really bad reality show, one that gets more audacious with each passing episode!
Election-year journalism is like a hyper-charged hockey playoff. Seducing us into believing that democracy is dangling by a thread, media gurus flex their political muscle without any iota of shame. But the sheer volume of their gibberish is so overwhelming, it’s hard to make head or tail of it.
Remember the alerts blaring about a supposed tape of ex-President Trump uttering a racial slur during his New York trial’s final day? Wonder why it’s disappeared without a trace from media discussions right after Trump’s guilty verdict? Clearly, these outlets were aware they were peddling a Luke-warm story at best.
Now let’s address the Times’ most recent non-event. Whatever criticisms the American media has, under the pretense of a violated flag, it’s clear they don’t respect tradition or norms. Do they genuinely think American citizens are naïve enough to go along with their ploys?
In an attempt to spice up their non-event, they introduced a new controversy: the infamous “Appeal to Heaven” flag spotted at Alito’s properties. The same flag associated with George Washington centuries ago. It’s like they want us to link the flag to the events that took place on January 6 or racism.
The real world doesn’t play out like they had hoped, so it’s clear there’s a need to revise history for democracy to prevail. Stealth Wikipedia edits try to hide the truth, but it comes out eventually. San Francisco, one of the bluest cities, had proudly flown the same flag yet remained undisturbed. Attempting to maintain their narrative, the flag has been discreetly taken down.
But who’s paying attention to this faux scandal anymore? Isn’t it clear that we’ve outgrown these media tantrums? The journalists seem to be running amok. As the election day inches closer, brace yourself for more far-fetched attempts. We’re not going anywhere and will be here to expose every twisted plot they cook up.
