It’s chaos on CNN as a federal judge delivers a staggering blow to the Biden administration’s dubious collusion with Big Tech. The injunction mandates an immediate cessation of governmental interference in social media user management under the guise of ‘national security’. For years, conservatives have been persecuted on these platforms, and now, the gavel of justice has come down hard. CNN’s liberal darlings are floundering in the wake of this unprecedented ruling, offering a tantalizing spectacle of panic and disbelief. Watch as our cherished First Amendment triumphs over censorship, sending shockwaves through the liberal establishment.
On an ordinary Wednesday morning, CNN was thrown into an extraordinary frenzy. A federal judge issued an injunction to halt the Biden administration from using Big Tech to muzzle voices deemed threatening to national security or public health measures. Unprecedented in its implications, this ruling has wide-reaching ramifications for our fundamental freedoms, challenging the unsettling union of government and social media giants.
Elie Honig, former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York and liberal legal commentator, was clearly staggered by the ruling. He tried to downplay its significance by labeling it a conservative political maneuver rather than a triumph of the First Amendment. Interestingly, Honig overlooks the fact that while he can freely air his criticisms on air, others face a different reality on social media platforms – a reality of censorship and silencing.
Honig’s critique of the ruling as one of the most “aggressive, far-reaching” verdicts, inadvertently acknowledges the pervasive and problematic interference by the government in everyday interactions between citizens and Big Tech. But, is it not the judiciary’s role to ensure the protection of constitutional rights when they are threatened, even by the executive branch? Honig served as an ADA in New York between 2004 and 2012 before joining the Attorney General’s Office for New Jersey, where he ushered in liberal bail reforms, painting a clear picture of his ideological leanings.
Honig questions the ruling, asking, “Who’s going to police this?” But the real question is, who has been policing our right to freedom of speech until now? The answer has been Big Tech, operating under governmental influence.
The conversation isn’t complete without mention of Judge Terry A. Doughty, the architect of this historical ruling. A Trump appointee, Judge Doughty was confirmed unanimously by the U.S. Senate, making it clear that his credentials and judicial acumen were respected across party lines. Now, with this groundbreaking decision, hestands firmly on the side of free speech, an integral pillar of our democracy.
Judge Doughty’s ruling sends a powerful message against censorship by Big Tech, an issue that has become increasingly politicized. Big Tech’s monopolistic control over information dissemination has been a growing concern, particularly as these platforms increasingly align with the official line of the federal government on various topics. This decision is a decisive check on these developments, securing a significant victory for free speech advocates.
Curiously silent about Tuesday’s ruling was the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization that typically leaps to the defense of First Amendment rights. Their lack of response adds to the growing perception of selective advocacy, a troubling trend for an institution tasked with safeguarding civil liberties.
On the other side of the political spectrum, Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., expressed jubilation at the decision, highlighting the political nuances of this issue. Kennedy, whose views have faced censorship on social media, recognized the significance of this injunction.
This response underscores the reality that protection of free speech extends beyond political affiliations; it is essential to maintaining a robust, functioning democracy.
What happened on CNN following the ruling wasn’t just a meltdown; it was a glaring reflection of the increasingly partisan approach to the issue of free speech. The First Amendment isn’t a ‘conservative talking point,’ but a universal principle that ensures all voices, liberal or conservative, can participate in the public discourse.
The shockwaves of this landmark ruling will be felt far and wide. While it doesn’t definitively resolve the complex debates around censorship and free speech in the digital age, it represents a critical step in asserting the judiciary’s role in protecting individual freedoms. At a time when these freedoms are under pressure, it serves as a stark reminder of their importance in our democracy.
As the dust settles on this historic ruling, one thing is clear: the First Amendment has won a monumental victory, proving that our freedoms aren’t beholden to the whims of Big Tech or governmental overreach. CNN’s meltdown is a testament to the ruling’s significance and a wake-up call to all who complacently observe our civil liberties being threatened. In this era of unprecedented technological influence, we must remain vigilant defenders of our free speech. For, as the CNN chaos vividly demonstrates, the battle for our fundamental rights is far from over. Watch on, America, for the fight has just begun.